45 plugins from public Claude Code marketplaces. Each one bundles skills, slash commands, agents, hooks or MCP servers that install together.
Showing 45 plugins that match these filters.
pm-claude-skillsmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1
openaccountantsopenaccountants/openaccountants1
turk-hukuku-skillsaydincan/turk-hukuku-ve-claude1
auto-empirical-research-skillsbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills1Submit the repo with .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and we list every plugin.
Submit marketplaceMoney-building skills (the offense to pm-money's defense): investing basics, index funds, asking for a raise, your first milestone, compounding, FI roadmap, and a financial checkup. Educational — not financial advice; account/tax specifics are jurisdiction-dependent.
Twelve NSDI-specific skills covering the spring/fall submission calendar, track choice, evaluation design with real traces and testbeds, one-shot revise-and-resubmit, artifact badges, and camera-ready duties, grounded in the NSDI '27 and NSDI '26 official pages checked on 2026-07-08.
academicTwelve OSDI-specific skills for USENIX systems-conference submission strategy, grounded in the official OSDI '26 Call for Papers, Call for Artifacts, HotCRP site, and USENIX open-access policy pages.
academicAI skills (tax rules your AI follows) for MT, NL, DE, IE and GB bundled as Agent Skills, plus the hosted OpenAccountants connector (190+ jurisdictions) and a /openaccountants command.
Konkordato hukuku: geçici ve kesin mühlet, konkordato komiseri ve alacaklılar kurulu, projenin hazırlanması ve tasdiki, sözleşmesel yeniden yapılandırma; mali güçlük yönetimi.
Explicit 8-step empirical-analysis pipeline in the traditional Stata ecosystem (reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + sdid + rdrobust + synth + psmatch2 + teffects + esttab + coefplot): from use/import to .tex/.rtf tables and .pdf figures, with the full modern DID toolkit (bacondecomp + honestdid + rwolf + ritest). Includes epidemiology and ML-causal modes. The first choice for referee-level Stata replication packs.
Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output with risk tier, role, top obligations, compliance timeline, and jurisdiction flags, then routes to detailed skills for full analysis.
Reviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.
Jurisdiction-aware review of technology and commercial contracts — MSA, DPA, SOW, LOE, NDA, SLA, EULA, IP assignment, vendor/supplier, and API/platform ToS. Classifies every clause (acceptable / negotiate / red-flag / missing), proposes redline replacements, checks governing law and data-protection obligations (GDPR, UK GDPR, India DPDP Act, CCPA), and outputs a structured risk summary. Built for tech and AI deals where training-data, IP-ownership, and liability terms need heightened scrutiny. Not a substitute for qualified legal counsel.
Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.
Structured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a prioritized compliance roadmap. Deep German BSIG-neu coverage (BSI registration, § 30/32/38, incident reporting, Nachweispflicht) plus high-level jurisdiction profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain. Built on ENISA guidance and BSI #nis2know packages.
GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Covers threshold assessment, multi-jurisdictional blacklist checks (DE, FR, IE, BE, NL, IT, PL), 5x5 risk scoring, necessity/proportionality analysis, mitigation mapping, Art. 36 prior consultation, AI dual-phase analysis, and audit-ready .docx generation.
Draft GDPR-compliant privacy notices as .docx for any EU/EEA jurisdiction and audience. Supports five notice types (Website/App, Applicant, Employee, Business Partner, B2C Customer) across DE, FR, AT, IT, ES, NL, BE, IE, and UK GDPR. Covers Art. 13/14 disclosures, AI Act transparency, cookie policies, multi-language support, DPIA indicators, and post-generation compliance checklists.
A zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your users are, then drafts only the required clauses — GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA, ~20 state laws, COPPA, sector overlays), and global/MENA (LGPD, Quebec Law 25, India DPDP, China PIPL, UAE/DIFC, Saudi PDPL), plus app-store, cookies, and AI/EU AI Act disclosures. Its rule: state only what you confirm; never invent a statute, citation, fine, or date — every claim is source-cited and QA-gated. Not legal advice.
GDPR Transfer Impact Assessment for Chapter V transfers under the EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology, the CNIL TIA Guide (January 2025), and EDPB essential guarantees. Handles transfer qualification, Art. 45 adequacy fast-tracks, Art. 46 full assessments with country profiles for 12 jurisdictions, and balanced Art. 49 derogation analysis. Outputs a Markdown report, a .docx formal TIA, and a JSON delta for RoPA interchange.
AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.
“Verification-first” methodology for the Extraordinary African Chambers, covering the Hissène Habré trial in Dakar. Every citation is verified against forumchambresafricaines.org and legal-tools.org. Covers the judgment of May 30, 2016, the appeal judgment of April 27, 2017, reparations of CFAF 82.290 billion for 7,396 victims, and universal jurisdiction. Research aid, not legal advice.
Verification-first methodology for the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's transitional justice court under the 2016 Acuerdo Final with FARC-EP. Citations are verified against jep.gov.co before use. Covers the 11 macrocasos (from Caso 01 secuestro through Caso 11 violencia sexual, including Caso 03 falsos positivos), the three sanction tiers (propias, alternativas, ordinarias), TOAR, and the SIVJRNR sister bodies (CEV, UBPD). Guards the key structural distinctions (Sala de Reconocimiento vs Tribunal para la Paz; comparecientes FARC-EP vs Fuerza Pública vs terceros civiles; Acto Legislativo 01/2017 vs Ley Estatutaria 1957/2019). Research aid, not legal advice.
