Report 01M7DV42R3MN482MPJMSXKWNDQ · checks-v2

Codeix MCP server: automated checks

What HostedMCP checked on 14 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC. Every result links to the public source it came from, so you can check it yourself.

Not verified

88/100

9 of 11 checks ran · 1 high finding · not a security audit

Checked: 14 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC
Commit: —
Package: codeix · 0.5.0
Methodology: checks-v2

What to fix for a higher score

2 checks can earn more points. The next scan runs within a week, or right after the repository changes.

OpenSSF Scorecard up to +15 pts
Add the OpenSSF Scorecard action (ossf/scorecard-action) to the repository and fix the weakest checks it lists, such as branch protection, pinned dependencies and token permissions.
Package name not close to a popular package up to +10 pts
The package name is one edit away from a popular package. If it is not a fork of that package, pick a more distinct name, and say in the README what the package is.

Origin

30 / 30 points

Source repository linked and reachable10 pts
montanetech/codeix is public and reachable
github.com/montanetech/codeix ↗
Pass
Package names this repository as its source5 pts
codeix, codeix name montanetech/codeix as source
npmjs.com/package/codeix ↗
Pass
Build provenance (Sigstore attestation)10 pts
Sigstore attestation for codeix, codeix
npmjs.com/package/codeix/v/0.5.0#provenance ↗
Pass
Open source license (OSI)5 pts
Apache-2.0
spdx.org/licenses/Apache-2.0.html ↗
Pass

Practices

5 / 5 points

Commit or release in the last year5 pts
Last commit or release 2026-02-21
github.com/montanetech/codeix ↗
Pass
OpenSSF Scorecard15 pts
How to fix: Add the OpenSSF Scorecard action (ossf/scorecard-action) to the repository and fix the weakest checks it lists, such as branch protection, pinned dependencies and token permissions.
Not checked

Supply chain

15 / 25 points

Package name not close to a popular package10 pts
codeix looks like @claude-flow/codex
How to fix: The package name is one edit away from a popular package. If it is not a fork of that package, pick a more distinct name, and say in the README what the package is.
Finding
No critical advisory in the package or its dependencies15 pts
1 resolved dependencies checked; no critical advisory
osv.dev ↗
Pass

Tool safety

20 / 20 points

No hidden instructions to the model15 pts
7 tool descriptions and the README read; no override phrases, credential paths or hidden characters
Pass
Destructive tools are labelled5 pts
No tool named like delete, drop or exec
Pass

Endpoint

not checked

Remote endpoint answers the MCP handshake5 pts
Not checked

What these checks do not cover

The server's code is not run and its logic is not audited.
Results describe the repository and package on the date above; a later release can differ.
A pass is not a guarantee of safety. Give every server the narrowest token or role it needs.

What to fix for a higher score

2 checks can earn more points. The next scan runs within a week, or right after the repository changes.

OpenSSF Scorecard up to +15 pts

Add the OpenSSF Scorecard action (ossf/scorecard-action) to the repository and fix the weakest checks it lists, such as branch protection, pinned dependencies and token permissions.

Package name not close to a popular package up to +10 pts

The package name is one edit away from a popular package. If it is not a fork of that package, pick a more distinct name, and say in the README what the package is.