42 plugins from public Claude Code marketplaces. Each one bundles skills, slash commands, agents, hooks or MCP servers that install together.
Showing 42 plugins that match these filters.
pm-claude-skillsmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1
rvdbreemen-adr-kitrvdbreemen/adr-kit1
sivalabs-agent-skillssivaprasadreddy/sivalabs-agent-skills1
existential-birdsexistential-birds/beagle1Submit the repo with .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and we list every plugin.
Submit marketplaceConversation-handoff document generator. Compacts the current session into a markdown handoff for a fresh agent — references existing artifacts (PRDs, plans, ADRs, issues, commits) by path/URL instead of duplicating them. Derived from Matt Pocock's MIT-licensed handoff with: (1) 3 stdlib Python tools (template generator tailored to 5 next-session emphases, artifact deduplicator across 5 categories of duplication, skill recommender matching content to 14 skills in this repo), (2) 4 references citing 7-8 sources (handoff structure, deduplication discipline, next-session skill matching, companion tooling), (3) cs-handoff-author persona agent + /cs-handoff slash command. Matt's no-duplication discipline + mktemp convention preserved verbatim per MIT.
Docs-anchored grilling session — interrogates a plan against the project's existing language (CONTEXT.md) and recorded decisions (docs/adr/), updating those files inline as terminology and decisions crystallise. Derived from Matt Pocock's MIT-licensed grill-with-docs with stdlib validators (CONTEXT.md linter, ADR scanner, glossary-code consistency), reference docs, cs-grill-with-docs agent, and /cs-grill-with-docs command.
Banking & lending skills: credit memos with covenant headroom, quarterly covenant compliance reviews, KYC/AML escalation write-ups, and portfolio risk briefs — credit and compliance judgment for analysts and RMs.
Drop-in ADR toolkit for AI coding agents: bootstrap and audit with /adr-kit:init, guided authoring with /adr-kit:adr, pre-commit and CI enforcement with file:line citations, context injection over a generated graph index, Guardian staleness detection, lifecycle commands, strict lint, adr-doctor, and a key-free MCP server.
A collection of agents, skills, hooks, commands, and rules for AI Agentic development workflow
Architecture analysis, brainstorming, 12-Factor compliance, ADR generation, and LLM-as-judge
ADR-driven documentation workflow: scaffold an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) catalogue, a plan/ queue, and AGENTS.md conventions into any repo, then author, queue, ship, audit, and roll up ADRs with lifecycle skills — across one repo or a multi-repo product.
Documentation architecture, API reference authoring, ADR writing, readme hardening, and doc quality.
developer toolsUse when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.
Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
Audits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.
Audits legal AI outputs and workflows for honest compression: unnecessary complexity, false simplicity, excessive caveats, hidden uncertainty and poor cost per legally acceptable output.
Audits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.
Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.
Use for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulatory, compliance, technology/product, and financial-model issues must be separated clearly.
Run an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is "available," "free to use," "clearable," or "already taken" — or asks Claude to "search the trademark register," "check USPTO," "check CIPO," "do a knockout search," "clearance search," "availability search," or "see if [mark] is trademarked." Trigger even when the user phrases it casually ("can I call my company X?", "is this name taken?"). Covers federal USPTO (TESS/TSDR), federal Canada (CIPO), common-law/web/state, and WIPO Madrid international. Output is a knockout availability memo with green/yellow/red verdict for attorney review. Includes professional-responsibility gating (AI-use disclosure, conflict check, scope confirmation) before substantive analysis. Not legal advice — produces work product for attorney sign-off.
PageRank-based jurisprudential authority analysis for Argentine case law (CSJN, federal courts). Peer-reviewed methodology published in JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Ranks precedents by citation network influence with temporal decay.
Ricerca rapida della giurisprudenza italiana, finalizzata a fornire un primo quadro orientativo su una determinata questione giuridica. Consulta le pronunce della Corte di cassazione, dei TAR e del Consiglio di Stato, nonché le banche dati giuridiche italiane (DeJure, Italgiure), per individuare le decisioni pertinenti; sintetizza l’orientamento giurisprudenziale prevalente, segnala eventuali pronunce contrastanti ed evidenzia le implicazioni operative ai fini della formulazione di pareri o della definizione della strategia. Il risultato è una nota strutturata di primo orientamento, non un’analisi esaustiva.
Analyzes legal disputes for mediation purposes — reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence), identifying contested issues, summarizing each party's position and interests, performing legal analysis of key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions mediation, dispute analysis, settlement, ADR, dispute resolution, party positions, caucus strategy, or asks to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal — including when they upload case files and ask for a structured breakdown of who wants what or how the case might settle, even when they don't explicitly say "mediation".
Turn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance playbooks, or professional feedback and wants a reusable Lawve-style skill. Do not impersonate the lawyer or claim to reproduce a person; distill only authorized, source-bounded capability.
