Claude Code plugins
443 plugins from public Claude Code marketplaces. Each one bundles skills, slash commands, agents, hooks or MCP servers that install together.
Showing 443 plugins that match these filters.
443 plugins from public Claude Code marketplaces. Each one bundles skills, slash commands, agents, hooks or MCP servers that install together.
Showing 443 plugins that match these filters.
Submit the repo with .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and we list every plugin.
Submit marketplaceOpenAI GPT Image 2/2.5/2.6 skill — Image 2.6 Flare by default, on-demand prompt references, and a packaged CLI for generation and editing.
Russian text quality editor: removes bureaucratese, calques and AI-style clichés without changing facts or the author's voice. 67 patterns, 21 hard bans, 3 modes (edit / audit / targeted fix), deterministic scanner with a 0-100 cleanliness score and a fact-lock. | Редактура русского текста: убирает канцелярит, кальки и нейросетевые штампы, не меняя факты и голос автора. 67 паттернов, 21 жёсткий запрет, 3 режима, сканер с баллом чистоты 0-100 и факт-замок.
Setup plus 17 CLI-backed Bohrium skills for compute jobs, development nodes, datasets, files, scientific databases, images, projects, knowledge bases, papers and patents, PDFs, scholars, SciencePedia, scientific tools, web search, sandboxes, LKM, and Science Mentor. Requires the bohr CLI (setup skill can install it).
Thirteen skills for short launch and social videos made in code: kinetic type, flat shapes, cartoons, 3D type and logos, data charts, pixel art, particles, app UI, photo reels, captioned clips, transparent overlays, data globes and story shorts. Each film is one self-contained HTML file driven by a pure seek(t), rendered at 1:1, 9:16 or 16:9 to MP4 with real motion blur, sound when needed and a verified seamless loop.
creativeWeb E2E testing with Playwright, Cypress, Selenium and WebdriverIO, plus cloud grids, a self-hosted Selenium Grid 4, and cross-browser test matrices. Covers BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, traffic-based T1/T2/T3 browser tiers, a framework decision guide, and Playwright's agent tooling (playwright-cli, Playwright MCP, planner/generator/healer Test Agents). Agents (playwright-codegen-reviewer, automation-harness-bootstrapper) refactor recorded Playwright or Cypress Studio specs and scaffold a full E2E harness for a repo with no suite.
functional-testingEight Kafka skills (topic audit, consumer lag, perf review, schema, security, connectors, DLQ, python client scaffold) powered by the Lenses MCP server
Full collection: 112 agent skills across development, testing, security, documentation, workflow, product, and content.
Agent skills for Ultralytics YOLO and Platform: model selection, dataset annotation, training, tuning, inference, export, and deployment through the Platform web UI, the Python package, and the yolo and ul CLIs.
developmentUse when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.
Pre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Returns a SAFE/CAUTION/STOP band with cited factors, a discovery-impact line, and a redacted-safe rewrite.
Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal documents, fact-checking regulatory content, performing red team review, or quality assurance before distribution to clients or stakeholders.
Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.
Guide to negotiating technology services agreements, professional services contracts, and commercial B2B transactions. Provides three-position frameworks (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size tactics, objection handling templates, and concession roadmaps. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections and demands, (4) Creating concession roadmaps that protect critical interests, (5) Assessing tactics based on deal value and leverage, or (6) Structuring balanced outcomes for liability, IP, payment, SLA, or warranty provisions.
Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.
Audit de conformité RGPD d'un site internet par un praticien RGPD/DPO. Observation systématique selon une checklist en 10 sections (mentions légales, hébergeur, formulaires, newsletter, politique de confidentialité, cookies, mots de passe, trackers, sous-traitants et transferts hors UE, accessibilité des droits) plus annexe 22 items art. 13/14 RGPD. Produit un rapport structuré (markdown, .docx en option) avec niveau de conformité global, points bloquants, points de vigilance, recommandations prioritaires et sources réglementaires citées (LCEN, RGPD, ePrivacy, délibérations CNIL, EDPB, DPF). Tool-agnostique : navigation automatique ou mode dégradé copier-coller. 7 arbres de décision pour les cas limites. Le praticien valide tous les statuts avant transmission au client. Analyse technique uniquement, pas de conseil juridique.
Edit, query, and transform Word documents (.docx) with the SuperDoc CLI. Use when the user asks to read, search, modify, format, comment, track changes, or review changes in .docx files. Triggers on any task involving Word documents — text replacement, redlining, contract markup, template filling, bulk edits, content extraction, or document review.
Run an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is "available," "free to use," "clearable," or "already taken" — or asks Claude to "search the trademark register," "check USPTO," "check CIPO," "do a knockout search," "clearance search," "availability search," or "see if [mark] is trademarked." Trigger even when the user phrases it casually ("can I call my company X?", "is this name taken?"). Covers federal USPTO (TESS/TSDR), federal Canada (CIPO), common-law/web/state, and WIPO Madrid international. Output is a knockout availability memo with green/yellow/red verdict for attorney review. Includes professional-responsibility gating (AI-use disclosure, conflict check, scope confirmation) before substantive analysis. Not legal advice — produces work product for attorney sign-off.
Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.
Framework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use in legal contexts, (4) Creating realistic scenarios for legal tech presentations, (5) Developing educational materials about AI in legal services, or (6) Testing AI-powered legal information systems in controlled environments.
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.