codebase-intel MCP server
Commit 23. Okt. 2026Versorgt AI Agents mit der Historie architektonischer Entscheidungen, Quality Contracts und Impact-Analysen, um sicherzustellen, dass die Code-Generierung den Projektmustern folgt.
Auch bekannt als a-mutharasu/codebase-intel
- Stars
- 5
- Tools
- 16
- Downloads, 30 Tage
- —
- Neueste Version
- —
- Letzter Commit
- 23. Okt. 2026
- Lizenz
- MIT
Was ist codebase-intel MCP?
codebase-intel ist ein MCP server. Versorgt AI Agents mit der Historie architektonischer Entscheidungen, Quality Contracts und Impact-Analysen, um sicherzustellen, dass die Code-Generierung den Projektmustern folgt. Er stellt 16 Tools bereit, etwa get_context, query_graph, get_decisions.
Zusammenfassung generiert aus dem README des Projekts
Über codebase-intel MCP server
codebase-intel dient als Context-Layer für AI Coding Agents, indem es die Logik hinter architektonischen Entscheidungen liefert und projektspezifische Regeln erzwingt. Es schließt die Lücke zwischen reinem Code und der Intention der Entwickler, indem es ein Decision Journal, Quality Contracts und Drift Detection anbietet. Dies ermöglicht es Agents zu verstehen, warum bestimmte Patterns gewählt wurden und welche Constraints bei der Code-Generierung respektiert werden müssen.
Entwickler können diesen Server lokal nutzen, indem sie ihn mit MCP Clients wie Claude Code verbinden. Er unterstützt Single-Project-Setups oder einen Global Mode, der Anfragen über den Befehl serve --auto automatisch an mehrere registrierte Repositories routet. Das Tool arbeitet über 19 verschiedene Sprachen hinweg mittels tree-sitter Parsing und hilft beim Management von Token-Budgets, indem es gezielten Kontext liefert, anstatt ganze Verzeichnisse einzulesen.
Durch die Nutzung von Tools wie get_context, impact_analysis und get_contracts stellt der Server sicher, dass der von der AI generierte Code den etablierten Patterns entspricht. Er identifiziert zudem veralteten Kontext durch Drift Detection und hilft dabei, typische AI-Fehler wie halluzinierte Imports oder unnötige Abstraktionen zu vermeiden.
Was du damit machen kannst
- 1Coding Standards erzwingenStelle sicher, dass die AI spezifische Projektregeln befolgt, wie zum Beispiel die Nutzung des Repository Patterns anstelle von Raw SQL.
- 2Historische Entscheidungen verstehenVersorge den Agent mit der Begründung, warum in der Vergangenheit ein spezifischer Algorithmus oder eine bestimmte Technologie ausgewählt wurde.
- 3Token-Usage optimierenReduziere die Menge der an die AI gesendeten Daten, indem du nur die relevantesten Files und den passenden Kontext bereitstellst.
Geschrieben aus dem README des Projekts. Jeder Use Case wurde gegen ein Zitat daraus geprüft.
codebase-intel MCP tools 16
Erkannt aus dem READMEget_contextquery_graphget_decisionsget_contractscheck_driftimpact_analysisget_statusrecord_feedbackget_efficiency_reportset_intentcheck_intentlist_intents
| get_context | — | |
| query_graph | — | |
| get_decisions | — | |
| get_contracts | — | |
| check_drift | — | |
| impact_analysis | — | |
| get_status | — | |
| record_feedback | — | |
| get_efficiency_report | — | |
| set_intent | — | |
| check_intent | — | |
| list_intents | — |
Alle 16 Tools anzeigenWeniger Tools anzeigen
bootstrapcheck_precedentrecord_whyget_intent
| bootstrap | — | |
| check_precedent | — | |
| record_why | — | |
| get_intent | — |
Automatisierte Checks
Geluften am 14. Nov. 2026Vollständiger Bericht →Noch nicht verifiziert. Ein Server benötigt einen Score von 80, keine kritischen Befunde und genug Daten für unsere Prüfung. Wie die Checks funktionieren · Was du für mehr Punkte verbessern kannst
- Source Repository verknüpft und erreichbara-mutharasu/codebase-intel is public and reachablegithub.com/a-mutharasu/codebase-intel ↗Bestanden
- Paket nennt dieses Repository als QuelleNicht geprüft
- Build-Provenienz (Sigstore-Attestierung)Nicht geprüft
- Open Source Lizenz (OSI)MITspdx.org/licenses/MIT.html ↗Bestanden
- Commit oder Release im letzten JahrLast commit or release 2026-10-23github.com/a-mutharasu/codebase-intel ↗Bestanden
- OpenSSF ScorecardNicht geprüft
- Package-Name ähnelt keinem populären PackageNicht geprüft
- Keine kritischen Advisories im Paket oder seinen AbhängigkeitenNicht geprüft
- Keine versteckten Anweisungen an das Modell16 tool descriptions and the README read; no override phrases, credential paths or hidden charactersBestanden
- Destruktive Tools sind markiertNo tool named like delete, drop or execBestanden
- Remote-Endpoint beantwortet den MCP-HandshakeNicht geprüft
README
Auf GitHub ansehenAI coding agents can autocomplete, refactor, and generate code. But they still fail at the things that matter most in production:
- They don't know your team decided to use token bucket over sliding window — and why
- They don't know the compliance team requires rate limit headers on every response
- They don't know that changing
config.pywill break billing and analytics - They generate code that looks right but violates your project's architectural patterns
codebase-intel fixes this. It's the context layer that sits between your codebase and any AI agent — providing not just what code exists, but why it exists, what rules it must follow, and what breaks if you change it.
Before vs After
WITHOUT codebase-intel WITH codebase-intel
───────────────────── ───────────────────
Agent reads: every file in the dir Agent reads: only what matters
Tokens used: 16,063 Tokens used: 5,955
Knows why code exists: No Knows why: Yes (13 decisions)
Quality guardrails: None Guardrails: 4 contracts enforced
Drift awareness: None Drift: stale context detected
Impact analysis: None Impact: knows what else breaks
Result: faster but fragile Result: faster AND correct
Real benchmarks on production codebases
| Project | Files | Naive Tokens | codebase-intel | Reduction | Decisions | Contracts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FastAPI monolith (auth + frontend) | 359 | 16,063 | 5,955 | 63% | 13 | 4 |
| Microservice A (AI processing) | 358 | 14,611 | 5,955 | 59% | 0 | 7 |
| Microservice B (document generation) | 87 | 2,461 | 1,275 | 48% | 0 | 6 |
| Microservice C (user management) | 153 | 5,904 | 1,476 | 75% | 0 | 4 |
Numbers from
codebase-intel benchmarkon real production repos. The token reduction comes from targeted graph traversal. The decisions and contracts are what no other tool provides.
What makes this different
There are great tools for code graphs (code-review-graph is excellent — 6K+ stars). We don't compete with them. We solve what they don't:
| Capability | Graph-only tools | codebase-intel |
|---|---|---|
| Code graph + dependencies | Yes | Yes (19 languages) |
| Decision Journal — why code is the way it is | No | Yes |
| Quality Contracts — rules AI must follow | No | Yes |
| AI Anti-pattern Detection — catches hallucinated imports, over-abstraction | No | Yes |
| Drift Detection — stale context, context rot alerts | No | Yes |
| Token Budgeting — fits context to any agent's window | No | Yes |
| Live Analytics — prove efficiency over time | No | Yes |
The missing layer
What exists today: What codebase-intel adds:
Code → Graph → Agent Code → Graph ──────────────────→ Agent
↓ ↑
Decision Journal ──→ WHY ────────┤
Quality Contracts → RULES ───────┤
Drift Detector ──→ WARNINGS ─────┘
"Here are the 3 files that matter,
the decision your team made 6 months ago,
and the 2 rules you must not violate."
Quick Start
# Install globally (no venv needed)
uvx codebase-intel --help # ephemeral, like npx
# or
pipx install codebase-intel # persistent global install
# or
pip install codebase-intel # traditional
# Initialize on your project
cd your-project
codebase-intel init
# See what it found
codebase-intel status
# Mine decisions from git history
codebase-intel mine --save
# Auto-detect code patterns and generate quality contracts
codebase-intel detect-patterns --save
# Run benchmarks (see the before/after)
codebase-intel benchmark
# View live dashboard
codebase-intel dashboard
Connect to Claude Code / any MCP client
Single project:
{
"mcpServers": {
"codebase-intel": {
"command": "codebase-intel",
"args": ["serve", "/path/to/your/project"]
}
}
}
Multiple projects (global mode):
# Register repos once from anywhere
codebase-intel register ~/projects/user-service
codebase-intel register /opt/services/payment-api
codebase-intel register /var/repos/notification-service
{
"mcpServers": {
"codebase-intel": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["codebase-intel", "serve", "--auto"]
}
}
}
In --auto mode, the MCP server automatically routes each request to the correct project based on file paths in the request. No manual switching — works like npx @playwright/mcp.
Now your agent automatically gets relevant context, decisions, and contracts before writing code.
The Three Pillars
1. Decision Journal — "Why does this code exist?"
Every team makes hundreds of decisions that never get documented. Why did you choose Postgres over Mongo? Why is auth middleware structured that way? Why was the sliding window approach rejected?
codebase-intel captures these from git history automatically and links them to code:
# .codebase-intel/decisions/DEC-042.yaml
id: DEC-042
title: "Use token bucket for rate limiting"
status: active
context: "Payment endpoint was getting hammered during flash sales"
decision: "Token bucket algorithm with per-user buckets, 100 req/min"
alternatives:
- name: sliding_window
rejection_reason: "Memory overhead too high at scale"
constraints:
- description: "Must not add >2ms p99 latency"
source: sla
is_hard: true
code_anchors:
- "src/middleware/rate_limiter.py:15-82"
Without this: your agent proposes sliding window (the exact approach you rejected 6 months ago). With this: your agent sees the decision, follows it, and respects the SLA constraint.
2. Quality Contracts — "What rules must AI follow?"
Linters check syntax. Contracts enforce your project's patterns:
# .codebase-intel/contracts/api-rules.yaml
rules:
- id: no-raw-sql
name: No raw SQL in API layer
severity: error
pattern: "execute\\(.*SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE"
fix_suggestion: "Use the repository pattern"
- id: async-everywhere
name: All I/O must be async
severity: error
pattern: "requests\\.(get|post)"
fix_suggestion: "Use httpx.AsyncClient"
Built-in AI guardrails catch the patterns AI agents mess up most:
- Hallucinated imports (modules that don't exist)
- Over-abstraction (base classes with one subclass)
- Unnecessary error handling for impossible conditions
- Comments that restate code instead of explaining why
- Features that weren't requested (YAGNI violations)
3. Drift Detection — "Is our context still valid?"
Context rots. Decisions get outdated. Code anchors point to deleted files. codebase-intel detects this:
$ codebase-intel drift
╭──────────────── Drift Report ────────────────╮
│ Overall: MEDIUM │
│ 3 items need attention │
╰───────────────────────────────────────────────╯
- [MEDIUM] Decision DEC-012 anchored to deleted file
- [MEDIUM] Decision DEC-008 is past its review date
- [LOW] 2 files changed since last graph index
19 Languages
Full tree-sitter parsing via tree-sitter-language-pack:
| Category | Languages |
|---|---|
| Web | JavaScript, TypeScript, TSX |
| Backend | Python, Java, Go, Ruby, PHP, Elixir |
| Systems | Rust, C, C++ |
| Mobile | Swift, Kotlin, Dart |
| Other | C#, Scala, Lua, Haskell |
CLI Commands
# Core
codebase-intel init [path] # Initialize — build graph, create configs
codebase-intel analyze [--incremental] # Rebuild or update the code graph
codebase-intel mine [--save] # Mine git history for decision candidates
codebase-intel detect-patterns [--save] # Auto-detect code patterns → quality contracts
codebase-intel drift # Run drift detection
codebase-intel benchmark # Measure token efficiency (before/after)
codebase-intel dashboard # Live efficiency tracking over time
codebase-intel serve [path] # Start MCP server (single project)
codebase-intel status # Component health check
codebase-intel intent [--verify] # Track and verify delivery goals
# Global workspace (multi-project)
codebase-intel register <path> # Register a project globally
codebase-intel unregister <id> # Remove from global registry
codebase-intel projects # List all registered projects
codebase-intel serve --auto # Start MCP server for ALL registered projects
# Cross-repo (microservices)
codebase-intel crossrepo <paths...> # Scan repos for cross-service dependencies
codebase-intel crossrepo --all # Scan all registered projects
# Intent graph (v0.3)
codebase-intel why "<title>" "<reason>" -f <file> # Record a why (confirmed trust)
codebase-intel install-hooks # Install the pre-commit intent gate
codebase-intel intent-gate # Run the gate manually
codebase-intel intent-check # Repair moved anchors, flag drift, report coverage
codebase-intel intent-confirm <node-id> # Promote an agent-asserted why to confirmed
codebase-intel intent-render -f html -o intent.html # Human view (html | mermaid)
codebase-intel intent-migrate # Import v1 decisions into the intent graph
codebase-intel intent-rebuild # Rebuild the SQLite index from the journal
codebase-intel intent-eval [repos...] # Token + correctness A/B vs the v1 baseline
MCP Tools (16 tools)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
get_context |
The main tool. Assembles relevant files + decisions + contracts within a token budget. |
query_graph |
Query dependencies, dependents, or run impact analysis. |
get_decisions |
Get architectural decisions relevant to specific files. |
get_contracts |
Get quality contracts for files you're editing. |
check_drift |
Verify context freshness before trusting old decisions. |
impact_analysis |
"What breaks if I change this file?" |
get_status |
Health check — graph stats, decision count, contract count. |
record_feedback |
Record if AI output was accepted/rejected — powers the learning loop. |
get_efficiency_report |
Live token savings, acceptance rate, before/after proof. |
set_intent |
Capture what the user wants with machine-verifiable acceptance criteria. |
check_intent |
Verify if acceptance criteria are actually met before marking done. |
list_intents |
Show all tracked intents with completion status. |
bootstrap |
Call first in a session. System orientation + task-relevant whys, packed into a token budget. |
check_precedent |
Was this already decided — or decided and reversed? Call before structural choices. |
record_why |
Record why a structural decision was made, at the moment it's made. |
get_intent |
Traverse the intent graph by node, file, or abstraction level; no args = coverage stats. |
Community Contract Packs
Pre-built quality rules for popular frameworks:
| Pack | Rules | Covers |
|---|---|---|
| fastapi.yaml | 10 | Layered architecture, Pydantic schemas, async, Depends(), secrets |
| react-typescript.yaml | 11 | Functional components, no any, custom hooks, lazy loading |
| nodejs-express.yaml | 12 | Error handling, helmet, rate limiting, structured logging |
cp community-contracts/fastapi.yaml .codebase-intel/contracts/
New in v0.3.0 — the Intent Graph
v0.2 could tell an agent what decisions exist. v0.3 captures why at the moment a decision is made, and lets agents traverse that reasoning instead of re-reading files and re-deciding things that were already decided.
- Journal-first.
.codebase-intel/intent-journal/*.jsonlis the committed source of truth;intent-graph.dbis a derived, git-ignored index you can always rebuild (intent-rebuild). - Four abstraction levels — system topology → service/module → component/flow → function/decision — linked with parent/child and
supersedesedges. - Trust tiers, surfaced everywhere:
mined(from git) →derived→asserted(by an agent) →confirmed(by a human, viaintent-confirm). Agents see which whys a human has actually vouched for. - Capture loop. Agents call
record_whywhen they make a structural choice andcheck_precedentbefore they make one. A pre-commit gate (install-hooks) warns — or blocks, withgate_hard— on structural changes that have no recorded why. - Session bootstrap.
bootstrap(task)returns top-level orientation plus the relevant whys within a token budget, with a degradation ladder: intent graph → code graph → raw files. It never hard-fails. - Anchor honesty.
intent-checkre-anchors whys when code moves, flags whys whose code diverged, and reports conflicts and coverage. - Human projection.
intent-renderproduces an HTML or Mermaid view of the same graph for review. - v1 migration.
intent-migrateimports existing decision records. It's safe to re-run. - Eval harness.
intent-evalmeasures token cost and retrieval correctness against the v1 baseline. First self-hosted result: accuracy@1 100%, ~99% fewer tokens than a naive file read — on n=3 cases from this repo only. See docs/EVAL-RESULTS.md for methodology and caveats; external-repo numbers are still to come.
pip install -U codebase-intel
codebase-intel intent-migrate # bring v1 decisions along
codebase-intel install-hooks # start capturing whys at commit time
An agent skill that tells Claude Code (and other agents) when to call these tools ships in skills/codebase-intel/SKILL.md.
Install it for Claude Code with:
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/codebase-intel
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/a-mutharasu/codebase-intel/main/skills/codebase-intel/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/codebase-intel/SKILL.md
New in v0.2.0
Global Workspace — One server, all your projects
No more running a separate MCP server per project. Register your repos once, serve them all:
codebase-intel register ~/projects/user-service
codebase-intel register /opt/services/payment-api
codebase-intel serve --auto
The server auto-routes each request to the correct project based on file paths. LRU cache keeps the 5 most recently used projects loaded — older ones are evicted and reloaded on demand.
Intent Tracking — "Did you actually build what was requested?"
AI agents say "done" when the code compiles. But did they actually deliver what was asked? Intent tracking captures goals with machine-verifiable acceptance criteria:
# Agent sets intent at task start (via MCP tool set_intent)
# Agent works on the task...
# Before marking done, agent calls check_intent
# System runs automated checks: file_exists, function_exists, grep_match, test_passes...
# Returns: 18/21 criteria met — 3 gaps identified
11 verification types: file_exists, file_contains, function_exists, wired, cli_works, mcp_tool_exists, grep_match, grep_no_match, test_passes, custom, manual.
Cross-Repo Awareness — Microservice dependency mapping
Scans 14 web frameworks across 10 languages to find exposed endpoints and outbound HTTP calls. Maps which service depends on which endpoint:
codebase-intel crossrepo --all --impact user-service
# Output:
# CRITICAL: 3 services depend on /api/v1/users/{id}
# → payment-service calls this endpoint [CRITICAL] at src/clients/user.py:42
# → notification-service calls this endpoint at lib/api/users.ts:18
Supported: FastAPI, Express, Flask, Django, Spring Boot, Gin, Actix, Rails, Phoenix, Laravel, ASP.NET, Ktor, Vapor, Echo.
Feedback Loop — Learn from acceptance/rejection
Records whether AI-generated code was accepted, modified, or rejected. Over time, identifies which context patterns lead to better output and which rejection reasons are most common.
Architecture
AI Agent (any) ──→ MCP Server (16 tools)
│
Workspace Manager ←── Global Registry (~/.codebase-intel/)
(multi-project routing, LRU cache)
│
Context Orchestrator
(token budgeting, priority, conflicts)
╱ │ ╲
Code Graph Decision Quality
(19 langs) Journal Contracts
SQLite+WAL YAML files YAML+builtins
╲ │ ╱
Drift Detector
(staleness, rot, orphans)
│
┌──────────┼──────────┐
Analytics Feedback Intent
Tracker Loop Tracker
└──────────┼──────────┘
│
Cross-Repo Scanner
(14 frameworks, 10 languages)
The Philosophy
We don't make AI agents smarter. We make them informed.
An agent with 1M tokens of context is like a developer with access to every file in the company — overwhelming and unfocused. An agent with codebase-intel is like a developer who just had a 5-minute conversation with the senior engineer: "Here's what you need to know, here's why we did it this way, and here are the three things you absolutely cannot break."
We don't compete with graph tools. We complete them.
Code graphs answer "what depends on what." That's necessary but not sufficient. codebase-intel answers the harder questions: Why was this decision made? What constraints apply? What will the compliance team flag? What did we already try and reject?
We don't hide the truth. We prove it.
Run codebase-intel benchmark on your project. See the numbers. Run codebase-intel dashboard over time. Watch the improvement. Every claim is backed by reproducible, project-specific data.
Contributing
Areas with the most impact:
- Contract packs — Share quality rules for your framework
- Language extraction — Improve parsing for specific languages
- Decision mining — Better git history analysis
- Benchmarks — Run against your repos, share results
git clone https://github.com/a-mutharasu/codebase-intel.git
cd codebase-intel
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
Contact
Questions, partnerships or security reports: mutharasu.theofficial@gmail.com. For bugs and feature requests, please open an issue.
License
MIT
codebase-intel MCP Fragen
Welche Tools bietet codebase-intel MCP?
Er stellt 16 Tools bereit, darunter get_context, query_graph, get_decisions, get_contracts, check_drift.
Wie hilft codebase-intel AI Agents dabei, besseren Code zu schreiben?
Es bietet eine Context-Layer, die erklärt, warum Code existiert, welchen Regeln er folgen muss und was kaputtgehen könnte, wenn Änderungen vorgenommen werden, um so architectural Drift zu verhindern.
Kann es den Token-Verbrauch für AI Models reduzieren?
Ja, es nutzt gezieltes Graph Traversal, um nur den relevantesten Kontext bereitzustellen, was die Anzahl der benötigten Tokens erheblich reduziert.