MemoryPilot MCP server

---

Why

AI coding assistants forget everything between sessions. MemoryPilot gives them persistent, searchable memory with project awareness, semantic understanding, and automatic knowledge organization. Built-in AAAK compression and memory capsules reduce token consumption by 5-10x when loading context. Every memory is auto-classified with the right importance, kind, and TTL on insert. The database compacts itself automatically — zero maintenance.

Benchmarks

LongMemEval-S (ICLR 2025) — Academic Standard

Evaluated on the 470 answerable questions of LongMemEval-S (ICLR 2025; the 30 abstention questions are left out, as the official retrieval protocol does). Turn-level index, ~50 sessions per haystack.

What the score measures. R@5 here is session-level recall_any@5: a question counts as a hit when at least one of the top 5 retrieved turns belongs to one of its gold sessions. It is a retrieval metric, not answer accuracy, and a question that needs several sessions counts as a hit as soon as one of them is found (300 of the 470 questions have more than one gold session). For scale: a plain BM25 over turns, with no embeddings, scores about 93% on the same metric and 74% on recall_all@5. These figures were measured with v4.2 (multilingual-e5-small); the current default model has only been measured on a 100-question slice (see v4.6 below).

Retrieval scores (same metric family, setups differ)

System	R@5 (recall_any, session level)	Notes	Source
MemoryPilot v4.2 (adaptive rerank)	99.1%	470 questions, ~900 ms/query on an M-series Mac	This repo, --benchmark-longmemeval
MemoryPilot v4.2 (rerank off)	98.7%	470 questions, ~28 ms/query with MEMORYPILOT_CROSS_RERANK=off	This repo, --benchmark-longmemeval
MemPalace v3.3.3 (hybrid)	98.4%	450 held-out questions after tuning on 50; 96.6% raw on 500	MemPalace v3.3.3 release notes
agentmemory v0.9	95.2%	500 questions (abstention included), all-MiniLM	github.com/rohitg00/agentmemory benchmark/LONGMEMEVAL.md
mcp-memory-service v10.34.0	80.4%	labelled R@5; hit definition not stated	v10.34.0 release notes

Answer accuracy (a different metric: an LLM reads the retrieved context and a judge grades the answer)

System	QA accuracy	Setup	Source
Mem0 (cloud)	94.4%	Mem0's own suite, top-200 retrieval	mem0.ai blog
Zep / Graphiti	63.8% / 71.2%	gpt-4o-mini / gpt-4o as reader, GPT-4o judge	arXiv 2501.13956, Table 2
MemoryPilot	not measured	an end-to-end QA run is planned

All figures are published by their own authors, none was reproduced independently, and the two tables cannot be compared with each other. On session-level recall MemoryPilot posts the highest published local score, by a margin smaller than the gap between this metric and a plain BM25 baseline. The protocol to settle a comparison: same 470 questions, same hardware, every system run by the same script, reporting recall_any@5, recall_all@5, turn-level evidence recall and end-to-end QA accuracy with a fixed reader and judge.

Detailed view — MemoryPilot vs MemPalace (closest local competitor)

Metric	MemoryPilot v4.2 (rerank off)	MemoryPilot v4.2 (adaptive rerank)	MemPalace v3.3.3	Delta vs MemPalace
R@5	98.7%	99.1%	96.6% raw / 98.4% hybrid	+2.5% vs raw / +0.7% vs hybrid
R@10	99.6%	99.4%	~97%¹	+2.6% vs raw
NDCG@10	95.1%	96.0%	Not published	MemoryPilot publishes
MRR	93.6%	94.9%	Not published	MemoryPilot publishes
Avg search latency	~28 ms (MEMORYPILOT_CROSS_RERANK=off)	~900 ms (the default)	N/A	search call only, models warm

¹ Validated with the full 470-question evaluation set (after dropping the 30 abstention questions) in two modes: hybrid retrieval with the rerank off (BM25 + cosine RRF, MEMORYPILOT_CROSS_RERANK=off, ~28 ms/query) and the default adaptive cross-encoder rerank (MEMORYPILOT_CROSS_RERANK=adaptive, jina-v2-multilingual, fusion weight 0.45, ~900 ms/query, suitable for benchmarks and high-stakes recall). Latencies cover the search call only, with models loaded; MemPalace's figures come from a different question split.

By Category (470 questions, adaptive rerank)

Category	R@5	R@10	MRR
single-session-user (64)	100%	100%	96.6%
single-session-assistant (56)	100%	100%	98.8%
multi-session (121)	100%	100%	95.7%
knowledge-update (72)	100%	100%	98.2%
temporal-reasoning (127)	97.6%	98.4%	93.3%
single-session-preference (30)	96.7%	96.7%	75.9%

French / Multilingual Benchmark — --benchmark-fr

To complement the English-only LongMemEval, MemoryPilot ships its own deterministic French benchmark covering 109 memories and 109 paraphrased queries across infra, mobile, web, security, and ML domains. The queries are intentionally distant from the indexed wording so they actually exercise the semantic lane.

Mode	R@5	R@10	MRR	Avg latency
Default fast (BM25 + jina RRF)	92.7%	99.1%	74.4%	~100 ms
Adaptive cross-encoder rerank, mmarco (v4.10)	99.1%	99.1%	97.4%	~210 ms (Apple Silicon)
Adaptive cross-encoder rerank, jina-reranker-v2 (default since v4.11)	100%	100%	98.0%	~436 ms (2-vCPU Linux VM)

v4.5 fixed a ranking bug that had capped this benchmark at R@5 ≈ 70% since v4.0: knowledge-graph neighbours were injected at a hard-coded score (0.1) above every genuine RRF hit (max 2/41 ≈ 0.049), so they occupied the cross-encoder window and pushed real matches past limit. Neighbours now enter below the weakest genuine candidate and only the cross-encoder can promote them.

v4.5.0 also closes two write-path stability bugs surfaced by that work: the episodic rollup embedded every hourly bucket on each pass (before checking whether the episode already existed) and did so synchronously inside add_memory, then panicked on multi-byte French text; it now runs on its own thread with a cheap existence check first. And auto-compaction held a Mutex across run_gc/compact_to_capsules, whose merged rows re-enter add_memory — a deadlock hidden until the rollup stopped panicking ahead of it.

Run-to-run variance is bounded to ±1 pp on R@5 / R@10 thanks to deterministic memory ids, deterministic id-based RRF tie-break, synchronous ANN warm-up, and explicit cross-encoder pre-warm before the first query. This is the metric to watch for any French / multilingual regression.

v4.6 — beyond single-fact retrieval

v4.6.0 targets the LongMemEval categories a top-k retriever alone cannot win: multi-session aggregation, temporal reasoning, knowledge updates and abstention. Everything stays local and rule-based or int8 ONNX. Measured on LongMemEval-S@100 (64 single-session + 36 multi-session, plus the 7 abstention questions of that slice) against v4.5.0, same machine, cross-encoder adaptive:

Metric	v4.5.0	v4.6.0
R@5 / R@10	99% / 100%	100% / 100%
MRR / nDCG@10	96.3% / 97.2%	96.5% / 97.3%
Multi-session gold coverage@10	93.6%	94.5%
Multi-session questions with all gold sessions in top-10	30/36	32/36
False abstention on answerable questions	—	4%
Extractive answer (search_memory … answer=true), contains-gold	—	48% (72% single-session; counting questions are out of reach for span extraction)

--benchmark-fr is unchanged within noise (R@1 96.3%, R@5 99.1%, MRR 97.6%).

• MMR diversity (src/diversity.rs) — the finalists plus the RRF ranks just below them are re-ordered by maximal marginal relevance over their stored vectors (λ = 0.4, redundancy floor 0.55). The top hit never moves, so MRR is untouched; a second, distinct source can displace a restatement of the first. MEMORYPILOT_MMR=0 disables it.
• Temporal grounding (src/temporal.rs) — explicit dates in a memory (2026-09-01, 12 septembre 2026, September 12, hier…) become date entities at ingest; a temporal phrase in the query (last week, il y a deux semaines, en mars, last Tuesday) becomes a day window that boosts dated candidates inside it (×1.25) and mildly demotes dated candidates far outside (×0.85). Undated memories are neutral, so a mis-parsed window costs at most the boost. MEMORYPILOT_TEMPORAL=0 disables it.
• Contextual embeddings — transcript chunks and other context-poor kinds are embedded with a [date · project] prefix while the stored content and its hash are left untouched.
• Superseding — the daily consolidation pass links a memory to a newer, near-identical restatement with a changed value (cosine ≥ 0.86, lexical overlap 0.55–0.95, ≥ 1 h apart) and the old one is demoted (−0.35) at search time. Both stay retrievable; consolidate_memories(apply=true) reports the links made.
• Calibrated confidence — every search returns confidence: { top_cosine, peak, cross_score, margin, level, abstain }. On LongMemEval the abstention haystacks are built from the same user's other sessions and no cheap signal separates them from answerable questions (top-1 cosine p50 0.46 vs 0.54, cross-encoder logits overlap fully), so the hard abstain is deliberately conservative (cosine < 0.35, 4% false abstention) and level carries the graded signal. MEMORYPILOT_ABSTAIN_COSINE moves the floor.
• Extractive reader (src/reader.rs, opt-in) — search_memory with answer: true runs deepset/roberta-base-squad2 (int8 ONNX, 125 MB, English, loaded on demand through the idle pool) over the top-5 passages and returns the literal span or nothing. ~480 ms per question on CPU. It is a benchmarking instrument and a shortcut for literal lookups, not a language model: it abstained on 5/7 LongMemEval abstention questions where the retriever could not. --benchmark-longmemeval --reader reports SQuAD-style EM / F1 / contains.

Search Quality — Real-World (500 memories, 30 scenarios)

Metric	MemoryPilot v4.2	MemPalace v3.1 (raw)	Quantum Memory Graph
R@5	100%	96.6%	93.4%
R@10	100%	N/A	93.4%
NDCG@10	95.6%	88.9%	90.8%
Cluster Coherence	96.7%	N/A	N/A
Multilingual	100+ languages (validated FR R@5 99.1%)	English only	English only
AAAK Compression	5-10x (no recall loss)	30x (recall drops to 84.2%)	N/A
Avg Search Latency	~28 ms rerank off / ~410 ms adaptive (default)	N/A	~80 ms
Install size	35 MB binary + ~530 MB of models downloaded on first run	~500 MB (Python+ChromaDB)	1.5 GB
Dependencies	none at runtime (single binary, ONNX bundled; models fetched from Hugging Face once)	Python + ChromaDB + SQLite	Python + ONNX

---

vs the best memory servers on the market:

Feature	MemoryPilot v4.7	MemPalace v3.3.3	agentmemory v0.9	Mem0	Zep / Graphiti
LongMemEval	99.1% R@5 (v4.2, recall_any)	98.4% R@5 (held-out split)	95.2% R@5	94.4% QA accuracy (not comparable)	63.8% QA accuracy (not comparable)
LongMemEval MRR	94.9%	not published	88.2%	not published	not published
Search	Hybrid BM25 + jina-embeddings-v5-nano RRF (768-dim, int8) + adaptive jina-reranker-v2 cross-encoder	ChromaDB cosine (all-MiniLM-L6-v2)	BM25 + vector + graph (RRF)	Vector search (cloud API)	Temporal KG traversal + vector
Embeddings	jina-embeddings-v5-text-nano-retrieval (100+ languages, 8k context, local ONNX)	all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (English only)	all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (English only)	OpenAI API calls (external)	OpenAI / cloud LLM extraction
Multilingual	100+ languages native (FR, EN, ES, DE, JA, ZH...)	English only	English only	Depends on API	Depends on LLM backend
Knowledge Graph	Temporal triples with validity + confidence	Temporal triples (SQLite)	Knowledge graph (no validity window)	Basic graph (no temporal)	Temporal KG (Graphiti, core feature)
GraphRAG	Auto entity extraction + graph traversal + combinatorial reranker	No	Partial (graph search lane)	No	Yes (LLM-based extraction)
Cross-encoder rerank	jina-v2-multilingual (adaptive, ~250 ms)	No	No	No	No
Query-aware ranking	Preference/temporal/role/update/technical intent boosts	Hybrid v4 keyword + temporal boosts	RRF fusion only	Depends on API	Graph-distance scoring
Corpus origin detection	AI transcript/codebase/notes/platform detection	v3.3.4 prep	No	No	No
Agent/persona disambiguation	Agents are separate from real people	v3.3.4 prep	Hooks-based session scoping	No	Partial (entity nodes)
Topic tunnels	Cross-project topic links via KG	v3.3.4 prep	No	No	No
Code-aware chunking	Tree-sitter Rust/Python/TS/TSX/JS + Svelte script extraction	Tree-sitter code chunking	No	No	No
Chunked RAG	Transcript auto-chunking + auto-distillation (8 types)	Conversation chunking by exchange	Session replay + JSONL import	No	LLM-based summarisation
Compression	AAAK + Memory Capsules (5-10x token savings)	AAAK dialect (experimental, regresses recall to 84.2%)	4-tier consolidation + decay	No	No
Auto-Classification	Zero-shot kind/importance/TTL on insert	No	Pattern-based via hooks	No	LLM-classified entities
Auto-Compaction	GC triggers automatically at 500+ memories	No	Lifecycle decay + auto-forget	No	Manual
Memory Capsules	Compress old memories into dense summaries	No	Tier-based consolidation	No	No
Memory Pinning	Pin critical memories — always in recall, GC-proof	No	No	No	No
Graph Traversal	Find related memories via KG (depth 1-3)	No	Yes (graph lane)	No	Native (Cypher / Neo4j)
Bulk Operations	Delete by kind/project/tag/age with safety guards	No	Governance delete API	No	Manual
Health Dashboard	Memory distribution, stale count, orphans, DB size	No	Real-time web viewer (port 3113)	No	No
Dedup Detection	Jaccard similarity scan for near-duplicates	No	Not documented	No	LLM-based reconciliation
Person detection	Auto-detects team members from text	No	No	No	LLM-extracted entities
Self-Healing	Background auto-linting loop	No	No	No	No
Garbage collection	Heuristic merge + scoring + orphan cleanup	No	Lifecycle + decay	Basic TTL	No automatic GC
Project brain	Yes, with team members (<1500 tokens)	No	Session summary on demand	No	No
File watcher	Context boost from recent edits	No	Filesystem connector (@agentmemory/fs-watcher)	No	No
Deduplication	Content hash (exact) + Jaccard 85% (fuzzy)	Basic hash	Confidence scoring	Embedding similarity	LLM-based merge
HTTP API	Multi-threaded REST server (optional)	No	REST + MCP + leases + signals	Cloud hosted	REST + GraphQL
Memory types	13 types, importance 1-5	Wings/Rooms hierarchy	Tier-based (working / short / long / archival)	1 type	Episodic / semantic
MCP tools	41 tools	29 tools	65 tools	N/A	Limited MCP server
Hooks / event capture	SessionStart auto-recall + Stop auto-ingest for Cursor, Claude Code and Codex (incremental, distilled, agent narration filtered, secrets redacted) + file watcher	No	12 named hooks (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot CLI…)	No	No
Privacy	100% local, zero API calls	100% local	100% local (SQLite)	Cloud dependent	Cloud or self-host (LLM required)
Language	Rust (single binary, zero deps)	Python (pip install)	TypeScript / Node (npm install)	SaaS	Python + Neo4j
Startup	1-2 ms (open_at) / synchronous warm via open_at_warm	~5 ms	Node boot + iii-engine init	N/A (cloud)	Heavy (Neo4j boot)
Binary	35 MB single binary	Python + ChromaDB (~500 MB installed)	Node runtime + iii-engine deps	SaaS	Python + Neo4j (~1.5 GB)
Storage	SQLite WAL + FTS5 + 16-conn read pool	ChromaDB	SQLite + iii-engine	Cloud DB	Neo4j + Postgres
Concurrency	EmbedPool (4) + RerankPool (1, tunable) + 16 read conns + debounced cleanup	Single-threaded	Node event loop	Single-threaded	Neo4j-bound
External LLM dependency	None	None	None (local embeddings)	OpenAI required	LLM required for ingestion
GitHub stars (Sept 2026)	nascent	nascent	~28.9k	53k	—

The 9 Pillars

1. Hybrid Search (BM25 + jina RRF)

Every memory gets a 768-dimension transformer embedding on insert via ONNX Runtime (jina-embeddings-v5-text-nano-retrieval, int8, local inference — 100+ languages including French, English, Spanish, German, Japanese, Chinese — no API calls, no external services; the model is fetched from its Hugging Face repository on first run, licence CC-BY-NC-4.0). Queries and documents use the model's asymmetric Query: / Document: prefixes. The int8 weights are memory-mapped, so the embedder costs ~250 MB resident, most of it reclaimable file-backed pages. Search runs both BM25 full-text and cosine similarity in parallel, then merges results with Reciprocal Rank Fusion.

Results are boosted by importance weighting, knowledge graph link density, file watcher context, and penalized for expired knowledge triples.

Ephemeral working memory is available in the same MCP through remember_working, recall_working, and clear_working. It keeps fast session scratchpad context in RAM, capped to 256 items, without polluting SQLite or durable recall.

Performance optimizations:

• Lazy embedding: add_memory returns instantly, embeddings computed in background thread
• Two-tier query embedding cache (LRU 256 + write-through SQLite): repeated queries skip ONNX inference
• Read connection pool (16 connections): concurrent vector searches don't block writes, sized for HTTP server workloads
• EmbedPool (4 sessions, env-tunable): parallel embeddings without serialization on a single ONNX mutex
• RerankPool (1 session, env-tunable to 2): parallel cross-encoder rerank under multi-client load
• Content hashing (FNV-1a): backfill skips unchanged memories
• Synchronous warm-up entrypoint open_at_warm: hydrates the ANN index in RAM before returning, eliminating cold-start tail (p95 search latency 3939 ms → 229 ms in the 4-client concurrency bench)

2. Temporal Knowledge Graph

A full knowledge graph with temporal validity. Facts have valid_from / valid_to dates and confidence scores. When facts become outdated, they are invalidated rather than deleted — giving the AI a timeline of how knowledge evolved.

Entities (technologies, files, components, people) are automatically extracted from memory content and linked bidirectionally. Search results from memories with all-expired triples are penalized.

5 dedicated KG tools: kg_add, kg_invalidate, kg_query, kg_timeline, kg_stats

3. GraphRAG

Every memory is automatically analyzed for entities: technologies, file paths, components, projects, and people. Entities are stored in a dedicated table. Memories sharing entities are auto-linked with inferred relationship types (resolves, implements, depends_on, deprecates...).

When searching, MemoryPilot traverses the knowledge graph from the top matches to pull in related context — e.g., finding the architecture decision that led to a specific bug fix. A combinatorial reranker then selects the best cluster of connected memories rather than independent top-K results, producing cohesive context (94% cluster coherence). Tuned RRF fusion (k=40), exact term coverage boost, smart FTS tokenization, query-time KG expansion, temporal recency, and importance tiebreakers push NDCG@10 to 94% with perfect R@5/R@10.