Plugins de Claude Code
26 plugins de marketplaces públicos de Claude Code. Cada uno agrupa skills, comandos de barra, agentes, hooks o MCP servers que se instalan juntos.
Mostrando 26 plugins que coinciden con estos filtros.
26 plugins de marketplaces públicos de Claude Code. Cada uno agrupa skills, comandos de barra, agentes, hooks o MCP servers que se instalan juntos.
Mostrando 26 plugins que coinciden con estos filtros.
Envía el repo con .claude-plugin/marketplace.json y listaremos cada plugin.
Enviar marketplaceTurn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: a manifest builder inventories a domain's skills/tools/checks, a goal compiler turns a goal into a verifiable task plan (refusing vague goals with forcing questions), and a JSON-backed loop controller drives execute->verify->close with retry caps, controller-run verification (no verification theater), human escalation on exhausted budgets, and a close gate that refuses while any task is unverified or unwaived. Ships 3 stdlib Python tools, 18 committed per-domain harness manifests + JSON schema, 3 references citing the 2024-2026 agent-harness canon (Anthropic long-running harnesses, verifier's law, SWE-agent, Ralph loop, Cognition), harness-runner agent + /cs-harness command. Use when an agent or subagent should pick up a goal, define its tasks, complete and verify them, and close the loop.
Customer Success skills: Customer Health Scorecard, QBR Deck, Escalation Brief, Churn Analysis, Renewal Playbook, Customer Success Plan. Score health, build QBRs, write escalation briefs, plan renewals with commercial strategy and objection responses, and build joint success plans with milestones and mutual commitments.
Improves code targets — skills, plugins, or a branch's changes — through an autonomous review-and-fix workflow with a pluggable reviewer (any installed skill or agent), a cross-round findings ledger, oscillation escalation, and a mechanical scope guard.
Support & customer-ops skills: Support Macro, Help-Center Article, CSAT/NPS Analysis (with an NPS calculator), Support Runbook, Escalation Tree, and KB Audit. For frontline support, CX, and success teams.
32 skills for running a support desk, from the hard reply to the bot handoff: hard conversations, workload and staffing, roles, metrics and coaching, escalations and incidents, learning from tickets, answers and knowledge, service design, and AI and bots, safely.
productivityMulti-agent application-security review. An offensive-security pipeline: map a codebase with Graft, hunt vulnerabilities with a per-class knowledge base, chain findings for escalation, verify real impact, and report (README/JSON/SARIF/doc/PDF).
securityBanking & lending skills: credit memos with covenant headroom, quarterly covenant compliance reviews, KYC/AML escalation write-ups, and portfolio risk briefs — credit and compliance judgment for analysts and RMs.
Scientific paper writing, source-traced review, and de-AI rewriting for top-tier journals (ApJ/MNRAS/PRD/JCAP-class) and NSF/NIH proposals. Ships 12 skills and 40 tools under one typed standard: scientific-integrity blockers that cannot be waived as style preferences, a zero-target L0 lexicon, ranked advisories, explicit measurement states so missing calibration never reads as clean, claim-first rewriting gated on hard scientific-fidelity eligibility, a mechanical length budget with a machine-built removal map and a required-shrink gate, corpus-calibrated salience-hierarchy, domain-register (with an exhaustive zero-hit vocabulary audit), collocation, and discourse-texture (given/new cohesion, epistemic hedging) axes, each judged against the field's own per-section distribution at the unit it was calibrated at, a residue axis that gates the trace an edit leaves, A-R review with narrative-spine and adversarial-escalation dimensions, registry-verified bibliographies (CrossRef, DataCite, a
writing21 role agents across four tiers, 26 portable workflow skills, and an escalation protocol that keeps work at the right level.
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.
Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies.
End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation.
Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.
Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.
White-box bug hunting, AI-agent and LLM red-teaming, cloud identity and CI/CD trust, client-app trust surfaces across browser and editor extensions and Electron, wire-protocol and token trust across gRPC, WebSocket, and JWT, enterprise identity lifecycle across SCIM and JIT provisioning, directory sync, MFA and key lifecycle, and Kerberos delegation, infrastructure-as-code and container hardening, mobile app security, smart-contract and DeFi review across EVM and Move, skill and MCP supply-chain vetting, API and object-authorization depth, host privilege escalation, network-service and transport trust, firmware and embedded-software trust, web trust boundaries, authentication and session depth, rate-limiting and multi-tenant isolation, injection and resource-exhaustion depth, file-upload and content handling, defensive detection and logging, supply-chain and dependency risk, business-logic and access-control depth, the classic web-attack classes across XSS, template and command injecti
securityHuman-in-the-loop (HITL) gate definitions for agent operations. Provides reusable YAML gates for destructive-action authorization, false-positive override, and recovery escalation. Loaded by agent loops and orchestrators that need bounded human checkpoints.
Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates legal, financial, operational, regulatory, customer, employee, patient, citizen, market, contractual, or reputational consequence.
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.