Desain dan verifikasi output runtime yang dapat diobservasi untuk skrip Python, PowerShell, atau Node.js yang melakukan operasi bulk atau request API.
- Bintang GitHub
- 41.038
- File
- 6
- Commit terakhir
- 11 Nov 2026
- Lisensi
- MIT
- Tool yang diizinkan
- —
Apa fungsi skill batch-script-progress?
batch-script-progress adalah agent skill. Desain dan verifikasi output runtime yang dapat diobservasi untuk skrip Python, PowerShell, atau Node.js yang melakukan operasi bulk atau request API.
Ringkasan dibuat dari SKILL.md skill ini.
Tentang skill batch-script-progress
Developer yang membangun skrip Python, PowerShell, atau Node.js untuk operasi bulk dapat menggunakan skill ini untuk mendesain dan memverifikasi output runtime yang dapat diobservasi. Skill ini berfokus pada pembuatan kontrak terstruktur untuk pelaporan progres, kegagalan item, dan ringkasan akhir tanpa mengubah logika pemrosesan dasar atau exit status dari skrip tersebut. Ini sangat berguna untuk loop yang berjalan lama, batch request API, atau tugas pemrosesan file di mana eksekusi yang diam (silent execution) membuat monitoring menjadi sulit.
Seorang agent harus memuat skill ini saat perlu memodifikasi skrip untuk menyertakan notifikasi awal, update progres berkala, dan ringkasan terminal. Skill ini memastikan bahwa data progres dikirim ke channel terpisah, seperti stderr, untuk menghindari polusi pada stream hasil utama di stdout. Skill ini mengandalkan pola implementasi spesifik untuk runtime yang berbeda dan menyertakan verifier lintas bahasa untuk membuktikan bahwa output terlihat saat proses masih berjalan. Perlu dicatat bahwa ini tidak ditujukan untuk progress bar UI atau infrastruktur monitoring, melainkan untuk membangun stream diagnostik yang andal, baik yang dapat dibaca mesin maupun manusia.
Apa yang bisa dilakukan agent dengannya
- 1Menambahkan progres ke skrip API bulkModifikasi skrip Node.js yang melakukan banyak API request untuk melaporkan jumlah yang diproses, berhasil, dan gagal melalui stderr.
- 2Memastikan konsistensi exit statusUpdate skrip batch Python untuk menyertakan ringkasan hasil sambil tetap mempertahankan kontrak exit code aslinya.
- 3Implementasi pelaporan error yang amanKonfigurasi skrip untuk mengeluarkan alasan kegagalan yang telah disanitasi untuk setiap item tanpa membuang raw exception atau data sensitif.
Ditulis dari SKILL.md milik skill tersebut. Setiap use case diverifikasi dengan kutipan darinya.
Cara install skill batch-script-progress
Setiap perintah menyalin folder skill ke direktori skills client. Restart client atau mulai sesi baru untuk memuatnya.Install skill batch-script-progress di Claude Code
~/.claude/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.claude/skills/batch-script-progressInstall skill batch-script-progress di Claude Code (project)
.claude/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress .claude/skills/batch-script-progressInstall skill batch-script-progress di Codex
~/.agents/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.agents/skills/batch-script-progressInstall skill batch-script-progress di Gemini CLI
~/.gemini/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.gemini/skills/batch-script-progressInstall skill batch-script-progress di Claude.ai
npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress batch-script-progress && zip -r batch-script-progress.zip batch-script-progress # claude.ai → Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill → batch-script-progress.zip
Pengecekan otomatis
Berjalan 13 Nov 2026Laporan lengkap →Lolos cek otomatis kami. Ini bukan audit keamanan: baca skripnya sebelum membiarkan agent menjalankannya. Cara kerja checks
- Source repository terhubung dan dapat dijangkaugithub/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress is public and reachablegithub.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/HEAD/skills/batch-scr ↗Lolos
- Lisensi open source (OSI)MITspdx.org/licenses/MIT.html ↗Lolos
- Ada commit atau release dalam satu tahun terakhirLast commit 2026-11-11github.com/github/awesome-copilot/commits ↗Lolos
- Skrip tanpa unduh-lalu-jalankan atau pencurian kredensial3 scripts read; no download-and-run, remote eval, base64 execution or credential uploadLolos
- Tidak ada instruksi tersembunyi di SKILL.mdNo override phrases, safeguard switches, credential requests or hidden charactersgithub.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/HEAD/skills/batch-scr ↗Lolos
- Tool yang diizinkan otomatis dibatasiNo pre-approved tools; the agent asks before using onegithub.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/HEAD/skills/batch-scr ↗Lolos
SKILL.md
Lihat di GitHubBatch Script Progress
Make generated batch scripts observable while they run, without changing their processing contract. Design start, periodic progress, per-item failure, and final-summary output together with result streams and exit status. A progress-bar library alone does not establish this contract.
1. Fix the existing contract
Read the script, callers, and nearby tests before editing. Identify:
- Input unit, known or unknown total, and whether enumeration is lazy.
- Existing stdout format and consumers, runtime version, and interactive versus redirected execution.
- Continue-on-error or fail-fast policy, retry rules, skip rules, transaction boundaries, and cancellation behavior.
- Existing exit codes and what callers treat as success.
Preserve these decisions. Do not add retries, parallelism, dependencies, or a new failure policy just to add progress output. If partial failures currently return zero, report the partial outcome honestly while keeping that exit contract. If the contract is missing or contradictory, ask for the decision that changes behavior; do not silently make it.
2. Define the output contract before implementation
Choose a small, stable vocabulary and fields, reusing the repository logger where suitable:
- Start: operation name, total or explicit unknown, and initial counters. Emit before expensive enumeration; discovery itself may need progress.
- Progress: processed, succeeded, failed, skipped, total or unknown, and elapsed time. Add a sanitized current-item identifier only when useful.
- Item failure: safe identifier, failure category or sanitized reason, and whether processing will continue. Emit when observed, independently of the normal progress interval.
- Summary: completed, partial, failed, or cancelled; final counters; elapsed time; known unprocessed count if available; and the exit status required by the existing contract.
Define processed = succeeded + failed + skipped for items that reached a terminal outcome. Keep in-flight and not-started items separate. Count each item once; retry attempts are not additional processed items. Do not label an item successful before its required commit, write, or acknowledgement. If a transaction rolls back, report rolled-back work rather than claiming durable success.
For an unknown total, report counts without a fabricated percentage, ETA, or remaining count. Do not materialize a stream just to count it. For zero items, emit start and summary with zero counts; never divide by zero.
3. Choose output streams and cadence
Reserve stdout for the established machine-readable result, pipeline objects, or protocol. Put progress and diagnostics on a separate channel; stderr is the portable default for standalone CLI scripts. Stderr output alone does not imply failure: callers must use the agreed exit code and result contract. Verify callers that treat any stderr as failure before changing their output. If stdout is reserved and stderr is incompatible, use an existing compatible logger or sink only when the caller already supports it. Do not move progress to stdout or another stream with changed semantics. If no compatible channel exists, stop and ask whether the output contract may change, or report that progress cannot be added safely.
Use a bounded cadence, such as every configured number of items or elapsed interval, rather than unconditionally logging every item. Emit start, failures, and summary regardless of that cadence. Preserve required per-item audit records separately. Avoid unbounded in-memory failure lists and repeated stack traces. Redact credentials, query parameters, personal data, and sensitive paths before formatting; do not dump raw exceptions or whole input records by default.
Use monotonic time for intervals and duration. Ensure output is flushed or drained so notifications arrive before exit. Use plain newline-delimited records under redirection; enable terminal rewriting or colors only for an appropriate TTY. Keep log-field meanings consistent across languages, not necessarily their exact formatting or libraries.
A time check at the end of a loop cannot emit while one item is blocking. For a long item, use existing progress callbacks, stage notifications, or a safely integrated heartbeat where the runtime permits it. A Node.js timer cannot run through synchronous event-loop blocking; a PowerShell progress display is not a durable log. If mid-item progress cannot be added without changing execution semantics, emit the current stage before it starts and disclose the notification gap. Do not promise a periodic heartbeat that the implementation cannot deliver.
4. Implement the smallest compatible change
Read language notes and safe examples for the selected runtime. The examples are executable output-contract probes, not production processors; adapt their emitter and accounting to the existing code rather than copying their failure policy.
Keep reporting separate from processing decisions. In concurrent code, serialize reporting through the coordinator and count completed outcomes, not submissions. On handled failure or cancellation, attempt one final summary and preserve the original outcome; a summary-write error must not replace the original processing exception. Do not swallow cancellation as an ordinary item failure. For host-managed cancellation, including PowerShell host stops, preserve the existing host behavior; do not convert stop exceptions into item failures or promise a final summary after host termination. Use finally for applicable cleanup, but verify the actual cancellation path in the supported host when graceful cancellation is part of the contract.
Do not force successful termination to deliver buffered output. In Node.js prefer setting process.exitCode and draining writes over an immediate process.exit(). Respect existing host/library semantics in PowerShell: a reusable function should not exit its caller. Forced termination, process crashes, and broken output pipes can prevent final reporting; do not claim otherwise.
5. Verify before reporting completion
Read verification cases, then run focused tests for the changed script with harmless fixtures. Capture stdout and stderr separately and check the real exit status. Verify start/progress ordering, monotonic counters, sanitized failures, exactly one summary on supported paths, and unchanged result contents and processing policy.
Prove liveness by reading the child process output while it is still running, not by examining output collected after exit. Check both terminal and redirected behavior when both are supported. A controlled pause after a progress event is a useful deterministic probe: receive the event, confirm the child has not exited, then release it. Keep such gates in harmless test fixtures or the test harness; do not add stdin waits, sleeps, or cancellation hooks to normal production processing solely to make a test pass. Prefer an existing callback or injectable processing boundary. If no safe deterministic seam exists, test the real path only with harmless inputs or report liveness as unverified. A watchdog may fail the test; it must not manufacture a successful result.
The bundled cross-language verifier runs the Python, PowerShell, and Node.js probes with normal, partial-failure, preserved partial-failure exit-zero, empty, unknown-total, fail-fast, simulated-cancellation, and live-output cases. It checks the probes only; it does not prove that an arbitrary generated script or automatic skill selection works.
Run it from this skill folder with Node.js 20 or later:
node tests/verify-examples.mjs
It also requires Python 3.9 or later and PowerShell 5.1 or later. See the language notes for executable overrides. Missing runtimes are failures, not silently skipped coverage.
Deliverables
Return the changed script, its output/exit contract, and focused verification results. Distinguish executed tests from inspection and unexecuted cases. Do not call the script verified merely because it prints a progress bar or the skill metadata passes validation.
Gotchas
- Counting before logging can make discovery silently consume an entire stream.
- Writing status with PowerShell
Write-Outputadds strings to the success pipeline. - Measuring only buffered output after exit cannot prove progress visibility.
- A final message saying
completedhides partial failure unless the outcome and counters explain it. finallyis not a guarantee of reporting after forced termination.
Berkas dalam skill ini
6Pertanyaan seputar skill batch-script-progress
Bagaimana cara install skill batch-script-progress di Claude Code?
Jalankan npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.claude/skills/batch-script-progress. Claude Code memuat skill dari ~/.claude/skills (semua proyek) atau .claude/skills (satu proyek) dan menggunakan skill saat deskripsinya cocok dengan tugas.
Client mana saja yang bisa menggunakan skill batch-script-progress?
Client apa pun yang membaca format Agent Skills: Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, dan claude.ai (unggah sebagai ZIP). Script dalam skill hanya berjalan di client yang mengizinkan eksekusi kode.
Bagaimana progres harus dilaporkan jika jumlah total item tidak diketahui?
Laporkan jumlah hitungan tanpa menggunakan persentase buatan, ETA, atau sisa hitungan. Jangan melakukan materialisasi stream hanya untuk menghitungnya.
Ke mana informasi progres dan diagnostik harus dikirim dalam skrip CLI?
Progres dan diagnostik harus ditempatkan pada channel terpisah, dengan stderr sebagai default yang portable untuk skrip standalone, sementara stdout dicadangkan untuk hasil yang dapat dibaca oleh mesin.
Bagaimana cara memastikan progres benar-benar terlihat selama eksekusi?
Anda harus membuktikan liveness dengan membaca output child process saat masih berjalan, bukan memeriksa output yang dikumpulkan setelah proses selesai.