CodeOracle MCP server
Commit 2 Nov 2026Menyediakan layer memori self-hosted bagi coding agent untuk melakukan hybrid codebase search dan mengambil riwayat keputusan arsitektural lengkap dengan sitasi.
Juga dikenal sebagai Jassu78/CodeOracle
- Stars
- 7
- Tools
- —
- Unduhan, 30 hari
- —
- Versi terbaru
- —
- Commit terakhir
- 2 Nov 2026
- Lisensi
- MIT
Apa itu CodeOracle MCP?
CodeOracle adalah MCP server. Menyediakan layer memori self-hosted bagi coding agent untuk melakukan hybrid codebase search dan mengambil riwayat keputusan arsitektural lengkap dengan sitasi.
Ringkasan dibuat dari README proyek
Tentang CodeOracle MCP server
CodeOracle memungkinkan tim engineering untuk memiliki layer memori yang tahan lama bagi coding agent. Sistem ini berfungsi sebagai index self-hosted yang memungkinkan AI client seperti Cursor atau Claude Code untuk melakukan hybrid codebase search dan mengambil keputusan arsitektural historis lengkap dengan sitasi wajib. Dengan menjalankan stack ini di mesin Anda sendiri atau di dalam VPC pribadi, Anda dapat menjaga lingkungan yang private-by-design di mana source code dan teks pull request tidak perlu keluar dari jaringan Anda.
Developer dapat menggunakan tool spesifik seperti search_codebase untuk hybrid retrieval, explain_file untuk melihat potongan file beserta keputusan terkait, dan find_decision untuk mengungkap alasan di balik pilihan teknis di masa lalu. Sistem ini mendukung setup all-local menggunakan Ollama untuk embeddings dan chat, atau dapat berintegrasi dengan cloud provider melalui file config. CodeOracle memastikan data tim tetap mutakhir dengan menggunakan GitHub webhooks untuk memicu reindexing inkremental, sehingga agent milik setiap engineer dapat mengakses arsip kode dan riwayat keputusan yang sama dan selalu diperbarui.
Apa yang bisa Anda lakukan dengannya
- 1Menjaga index codebase tetap privatJalankan stack indexing dan search secara lengkap di lokal untuk memastikan tidak ada source code yang diunggah ke cloud vendor.
Ditulis berdasarkan README proyek. Setiap use case diperiksa terhadap kutipan dari README tersebut.
Konfigurasi
CODEORACLE_REPO_ID
| Nama | Deskripsi | Tipe |
|---|---|---|
| CODEORACLE_REPO_ID | — |
Pengecekan otomatis
Berjalan 14 Nov 2026Laporan lengkap →Belum diverifikasi. Sebuah server memerlukan skor 80, tidak ada temuan serius, dan data yang cukup untuk kami periksa. Cara kerja checks · Yang perlu diperbaiki untuk menambah poin
- Source repository terhubung dan dapat dijangkaujassu78/codeoracle is public and reachablegithub.com/jassu78/codeoracle ↗Lolos
- Nama paket mencantumkan repositori ini sebagai sumbernyaTidak diperiksa
- Provenance build (atestasi Sigstore)Tidak diperiksa
- Lisensi open source (OSI)MITspdx.org/licenses/MIT.html ↗Lolos
- Ada commit atau release dalam satu tahun terakhirLast commit or release 2026-11-02github.com/jassu78/codeoracle ↗Lolos
- OpenSSF ScorecardTidak diperiksa
- Nama package tidak mirip dengan package populerTidak diperiksa
- Tidak ada advisory kritis pada paket atau dependensinyaTidak diperiksa
- Tidak ada instruksi tersembunyi untuk model0 tool descriptions and the README read; no override phrases, credential paths or hidden charactersLolos
- Tools yang bersifat destruktif telah diberi labelTidak diperiksa
- Endpoint remote merespons handshake MCPTidak diperiksa
README
Lihat di GitHubCodeOracle
Self-hosted MCP server that searches your codebase and remembers why it was built that way.
Plug it into Cursor, Claude Code, or any MCP client. Index once. Ask with citations. Stay fresh via GitHub webhooks or a local reindex.
Status: actively developed. Hybrid code search and file explain are the strongest paths today. Decision memory works end-to-end, but extract quality tracks whatever chat model you configure — we treat that as a known limit and keep improving ranking, prompts, and evals. We do not claim “perfect answers out of the box.”
Default path is private-by-design: run the stack on your machine or your VPC; use local Ollama (or any local OpenAI-compatible server) for embeddings and, if you want, for decision extract — so source and PR text need not leave your network. Cloud providers are optional, config-only, and never required for search.
Interactive overview: docs/demo/index.html · live site (GitHub Pages): https://jassu78.github.io/CodeOracle/
Contributing: CONTRIBUTING.md
Privacy & offline
CodeOracle is built for teams that want agent memory without shipping the monorepo to a vendor RAG cloud by default.
| Mode | What leaves your machine |
|---|---|
| All-local (Compose + Ollama embed ± local chat) | Nothing required for search; extract stays local if chat is local |
| Local embed + optional cloud chat | Only texts you send to extract (PR/commit bodies), after secret scrubbing — not a full repo upload product |
| Your own VPC | Same binary; point providers.yaml at internal endpoints |
That is the wedge beside “ask the IDE on demand”: a durable index you operate, with citations, that can run air-gapped or offline for the search path. Infra and model capacity are still your cost — local does not mean free of hardware.
What this is (and isn’t)
Coding agents are strong at reading today’s files in-session. They are weak at durable team memory:
- why Postgres won over the alternative two years ago
- which PR recorded an auth edge case
- what you already rejected — and why
That context lives in PR bodies, review threads, and people’s heads. Session to session, the agent forgets.
CodeOracle is a small, cited memory layer your agent can call over MCP — not another “chat with the repo” UI, and not a replacement for Cursor’s own indexing.
| Is | Is not |
|---|---|
| Hybrid search + decision archive with mandatory citations | A Cursor competitor for general coding |
| Self-hosted index your team owns | “Upload the monorepo to our cloud” by default |
| Tools any MCP client can call | Locked to one IDE |
| Fresh via webhooks / reindex | Magic that invents rationale missing from sources |
Product test: if you remove a fancy UI and still have queryable architectural decisions + cited code search for any coding agent, you built CodeOracle.
Why not “just ask Cursor”?
Cursor (and similar tools) already do a quick lookup of the current tree — and they’re excellent at that. Use them.
CodeOracle is for the layer beside that:
- Cited retrieval you own — ranked chunks with file paths, same contract every time, on hardware you control.
- Decision memory — structured WHY mined from git/PR history, with a mandatory source URL (not vibes).
- Team freshness — one shared index updated by webhooks, so every engineer’s agent sees the same archive.
If the only job is “find this function in the open repo,” the editor is enough. If the job is “remember why we chose this, with proof, across sessions and teammates,” that’s the gap this project targets — and we’re still sharpening how well extraction fills that gap depending on the chat model you run.
What you get
| Tool | What it does | Needs |
|---|---|---|
search_codebase |
Hybrid search over indexed chunks | Embeddings |
explain_file |
File chunks + related decisions (no LLM rewrite) | Index |
find_decision |
WHY, alternatives, confidence, source URL | Extract once with a chat model; queries are retrieval only |
Typical loop: register a repo → worker indexes → optional decision extract → connect MCP → optional GitHub push webhooks.
Rules we do not bend
- No citation = bug — every hit has a
filePath; every decision has asourceUrl - No invent — extraction never invents tech, paths, or alternatives missing from the source
- Config-only providers — new LLM hosts are a
providers.yamlchange, never a new SDK - Domain owns policy — ranking and filters live in
@codeoracle/core-domain, not in HTTP glue
Honest limits (read this)
- Search / explain improve with a good index and embeddings. Prefer symbol-ish queries when you can (
authorizeForRepobeats vague prose). Soft NL can still prefer docs over code — we’re tightening that with evals. - Decision extract quality follows your chat model and how much rationale exists in PR/commit text. Small or weak local models often produce thin or noisy decisions; stronger models (local or cloud) usually do better. Empty
alternativesis often honest — the source never named an option. - CodeOracle narrows the haystack; it does not replace the coding model in your editor.
- Prefer all-local providers when code must not leave your environment; use cloud chat only when you accept that extract payloads go to that API.
Architecture
Layers: blue = who calls in · green = runtimes · amber = product logic · indigo = storage and models.
| Path | Flow |
|---|---|
| Ask | Editor → mcp-server → retrieval (+ core-domain) → Postgres / Qdrant → cited answer |
| Index | CLI/API → Redis → worker → chunker + gateway → Postgres + Qdrant |
| Extract | worker → extraction → gateway (chat) → decisions in Postgres (+ vectors) |
| Fresh | GitHub push → api (HMAC) → incremental_reindex |
Packages never import apps. Shared shapes live in @codeoracle/contracts.
Tech stack
| Area | Choice |
|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript, pnpm workspaces, Turborepo |
| Validation | Zod (contracts, config) |
| API / jobs | Node HTTP API, BullMQ on Redis |
| Metadata | Postgres 16, Drizzle ORM |
| Vectors | Qdrant (code_chunks hybrid, decisions dense) |
| Chunking | tree-sitter (TS/Python) + sliding-window fallback |
| Models | OpenAI-compatible /v1 via gateway (Ollama default embed) |
| MCP | @modelcontextprotocol/sdk — stdio or Streamable HTTP |
| GitHub | Octokit + webhook HMAC |
| Tests | Vitest, Compose smoke, e2e, golden eval |
Data model
Postgres is the source of truth. Qdrant stores vectors only.
| Table | Purpose |
|---|---|
repos |
Registered repo, index_status, clone path, embedding model lock |
chunks |
Chunk text + metadata; qdrant_point_id links to the vector |
decisions |
WHY memory — source_url is NOT NULL |
github_sources |
Raw PR/commit bodies for extraction |
job_history |
Idempotency (repo_id, job_type, dedupe_key) + errors |
api_tokens |
Hashed per-repo bearer tokens (co_…) |
Qdrant: code_chunks (dense + sparse), decisions (dense).
MCP result shapes (citations required) — packages/contracts/src/mcp.ts:
// search_codebase → { results: [{ chunkId, filePath, symbolName, content, score, repoId }] }
// explain_file → { path, chunkSummaries, relatedDecisions: [{ topic, summary, sourceUrl, … }] }
// find_decision → { results: [{ topic, summary, alternativesConsidered, sourceUrl, confidence, superseded }] }
Schema source: packages/db/src/schema/.
Jobs on queue codeoracle: full_index → chunk_file → embed_chunks → (optional) extract_decisions; webhooks enqueue incremental_reindex.
Quick start (≤ 10 minutes)
1. Install
git clone git@github.com:Jassu78/CodeOracle.git
cd CodeOracle
corepack enable
pnpm install
2. Config + data plane
cp .env.example .env
cp providers.yaml.example providers.yaml
cd infra/compose && docker compose up -d && cd ../..
pnpm db:migrate
Defaults match Compose (DATABASE_URL, REDIS_URL, QDRANT_URL).
3. Embeddings
ollama pull nomic-embed-text
Search works with embeddings alone. Enable a chat row in providers.yaml (and its API key, if any) only when you want decision extraction. Prefer a capable chat model for extract — tiny models are fine for experiments, weaker for production-quality decisions.
4. Worker + register + index
# Terminal A
pnpm worker
# Terminal B — local mirror (no GitHub PAT)
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo register --local-path /absolute/path/to/your/repo
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo index <repoId>
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo status <repoId> # wait for ready
GitHub: set GITHUB_PAT, then repo register --github OWNER/REPO.
Guided setup: pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- init.
5. Connect MCP
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- mcp-config <repoId>
Paste into Cursor MCP settings (or .cursor/mcp.json), then reload.
Or:
export CODEORACLE_REPO_ID=<repoId>
pnpm mcp # stdio
pnpm mcp:http # HTTP — bearer required
6. Extract decisions (optional)
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- decisions extract <repoId>
pnpm decisions:review <repoId>
Cap spend with EXTRACT_QUEUE_LIMIT / --limit N and EXTRACT_REPO_DAILY_TOKEN_BUDGET.
Try asking
| Tool | Example |
|---|---|
search_codebase |
where do we validate JWT |
explain_file |
apps/api/src/lib/auth.ts |
find_decision |
why hybrid ranking |
Prefer symbol names over vague NL when searching (verifyGitHubSignature beats “where do we verify webhooks”).
Configuration
| File | Role |
|---|---|
.env ← .env.example |
Runtime env (fail-loud validation) |
providers.yaml ← providers.yaml.example |
Chat/embed endpoints (gitignored) |
Required: DATABASE_URL, REDIS_URL, QDRANT_URL.
Common optional: GITHUB_PAT, GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET, CODEORACLE_REPO_ID, API_TOKEN, MCP_HTTP_*, WORKER_CONCURRENCY, EXTRACT_*, provider *_API_KEY vars for enabled YAML rows.
Adding a provider = edit providers.yaml, set the key, enabled: true. Lower priority is tried first; failover on 429/5xx/network.
All-local example
chat:
- id: ollama-local
kind: chat
baseUrl: http://localhost:11434/v1
apiKeyEnv: null
model: qwen2.5-coder:7b # use the strongest local chat model you can run for extract
priority: 1
enabled: true
embeddings:
- id: ollama-embed-local
kind: embeddings
baseUrl: http://localhost:11434/v1
apiKeyEnv: null
model: nomic-embed-text
priority: 1
enabled: true
MCP transports
| Mode | Command | Auth |
|---|---|---|
| stdio | pnpm mcp |
Editor spawns the process |
| Streamable HTTP | pnpm mcp:http |
Bearer required (API_TOKEN, MCP_HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN, or scoped co_…) |
HTTP listens on 127.0.0.1:3100/mcp by default. Open-dev is not allowed on HTTP.
{
"mcpServers": {
"codeoracle": {
"command": "pnpm",
"args": ["--dir", "/absolute/path/to/CodeOracle", "mcp"],
"env": { "CODEORACLE_REPO_ID": "<repo-uuid>" }
}
}
}
CLI
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- init
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- doctor
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo register --github OWNER/REPO
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo register --local-path /abs/path
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo index <repoId>
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo status <repoId>
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- repo recover <repoId>
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- decisions extract <repoId> [--clear] [--limit N]
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- decisions review <repoId>
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- decisions failures <repoId>
pnpm --filter @codeoracle/cli start -- mcp-config <repoId>
Shortcuts: pnpm worker · pnpm api · pnpm mcp · pnpm mcp:http · pnpm db:migrate · pnpm decisions:review.
Webhooks
- Set
GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRETin.envand on GitHub. - Run
pnpm apibehind HTTPS in production. - Webhook URL:
https://<host>/webhooks/github· JSON · Push (+ Ping).
Push → HMAC verify → incremental_reindex. See apps/api/README.md.
Auth
| Principal | Use |
|---|---|
| Open-dev | No API_TOKEN and no api_tokens — local API only |
API_TOKEN |
Admin (any repo; mint tokens) |
Per-repo co_… |
Scoped to one repoId |
MCP HTTP always needs a bearer.
Repo layout
apps/ api · worker · mcp-server · cli
packages/ contracts · config · db · core-domain · chunker
gateway · retrieval · extraction · queue · observability
infra/ compose · docker images · ops helpers · ci notes
test/ sample-repo · golden eval · e2e
docs/ intro · specs · demo page
Production notes
- Keep api + worker + mcp running; Compose for Postgres / Redis / Qdrant.
- One worker only per Redis queue — duplicates keep stale code in memory after rebuilds. See
infra/dogfood/README.md. - Terminate TLS in front of API (and MCP HTTP if remote).
- Do not expose Postgres, Redis, Qdrant, or Ollama to the public internet.
- Set
API_TOKENand webhook secret before exposing the API. - Images:
infra/docker/README.md. - Full reindex recreates Qdrant
code_chunks— fine for a single-repo deployment; plan multi-repo carefully.
Quality & CI
PRs need lint, typecheck, unit tests, Compose smoke, integration e2e, and golden eval. See infra/ci/README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md.
Live index replay (any ready repo): suite JSON + codeoracle replay <repoId> --suite test/replay/suites/….json — see test/replay/README.md. Complements fixture pnpm test:eval; does not replace it. CI runs golden eval + replay unit/schema tests; live product-index replay is an ops gate (needs a ready index + real embeddings).
License
MIT © 2026 Jaswanth Jogi — LICENSE.
Pertanyaan tentang CodeOracle MCP
Apakah kode saya dikirim ke penyedia cloud?
Tidak secara default. Anda dapat menjalankan seluruh stack secara lokal menggunakan Ollama untuk embeddings dan chat, sehingga memastikan source code dan teks PR tidak pernah keluar dari jaringan Anda.
Bagaimana CodeOracle menangani decision memory?
CodeOracle menggali informasi 'why' yang terstruktur dari git dan riwayat PR, serta menyediakan URL sumber wajib dan alternatif yang dipertimbangkan untuk mencegah halusinasi.
Bisakah saya menggunakannya dengan Cursor atau Claude Code?
Ya, Anda bisa menghubungkannya ke Cursor, Claude Code, atau client MCP lainnya melalui koneksi stdio atau Streamable HTTP.
Apakah ini menggantikan indexing milik Cursor?
Tidak, ini dirancang untuk bekerja berdampingan dengan Cursor, dengan fokus pada durable team memory dan keputusan arsitektural yang memiliki sitasi, bukan sekadar pencarian file cepat.