MCP server de Consentry
Commit 23 oct 2026Actúa como un firewall de consentimiento para agentes de IA mediante la aplicación de minimización de datos a nivel de campo, solicitudes de consentimiento en tiempo real y cuarentena de inyecciones de prompts.
También conocido como vnmoorthy/consentry
- Stars
- 1
- Herramientas
- —
- Descargas, 30 días
- —
- Última versión
- —
- Último commit
- 23 oct 2026
- Licencia
- MIT
¿Qué es Consentry MCP?
Consentry es un MCP server. Actúa como un firewall de consentimiento para agentes de IA mediante la aplicación de minimización de datos a nivel de campo, solicitudes de consentimiento en tiempo real y cuarentena de inyecciones de prompts.
Resumen generado a partir del README del proyecto
Acerca del MCP server de Consentry
Consentry logra proteger la información personal de los agentes de IA actuando como un firewall de consentimiento entre los modelos y las herramientas externas. Se sitúa entre un agente y sus APIs conectadas, MCP servers u otras empresas para aplicar la minimización de datos y la seguridad. El sistema inspecciona los campos de salida para garantizar que los detalles sensibles, como números de tarjetas de crédito o ubicaciones exactas, se sustituyan por versiones minimizadas, como tarjetas virtuales de un solo uso o coordenadas a nivel de barrio.
Los desarrolladores pueden implementar esto como un MCP server o como una puerta de enlace HTTP. Funciona con clientes como Claude Desktop, Claude Code y Cursor. El servidor puede ejecutarse localmente en un navegador sin un backend o como un servicio basado en Node que requiere una Anthropic API key para la integración con Claude. Utiliza un motor de políticas por campo para decidir si permite, minimiza, pregunta o deniega el acceso a los datos en función del nivel de confianza del destinatario. Para garantizar la integridad, mantiene un registro encadenado mediante hashes SHA-256 que crea un recibo de privacidad a prueba de manipulaciones para cada interacción del agente.
Qué puedes hacer con él
- 1Minimizar el intercambio de datos sensiblesUn agente puede proporcionar una ubicación por barrio en lugar de una coordenada GPS exacta al reservar un servicio.
- 2Prevenir ataques de inyección de promptsEl firewall escanea las respuestas de las herramientas entrantes para poner en cuarentena contenido malicioso o intentos ocultos de exfiltración.
- 3Aplicar el consentimiento del usuario en tiempo realEl sistema pausa al agente para permitir que el usuario elija entre compartir los datos exactos o una versión minimizada.
- 4Auditar el historial de exposición de datosLos usuarios pueden revisar una matriz detallada de qué destinatarios tienen acceso a tipos específicos de sus datos.
Escrito a partir del README del proyecto. Cada caso de uso se verifica con una cita del mismo.
Configuración
CONSENTRY_URL
| Nombre | Descripción | Tipo |
|---|---|---|
| CONSENTRY_URL | — |
Verificaciones automáticas
Ejecutado 15 nov 2026Informe completo →Aún no verificado. Un servidor necesita una puntuación de 80, ningún hallazgo grave y suficientes datos para que podamos revisarlo. Cómo funcionan las verificaciones · Qué corregir para obtener más puntos
- Repositorio de origen vinculado y accesiblevnmoorthy/consentry is public and reachablegithub.com/vnmoorthy/consentry ↗Aprobado
- El paquete indica este repositorio como su origenNo verificado
- Procedencia de la compilación (atestación de Sigstore)No verificado
- Licencia de código abierto (OSI)MITspdx.org/licenses/MIT.html ↗Aprobado
- Commit o lanzamiento en el último añoLast commit or release 2026-10-23github.com/vnmoorthy/consentry ↗Aprobado
- OpenSSF ScorecardNo verificado
- El nombre del paquete no es similar a un paquete popularNo verificado
- No hay avisos críticos en el paquete ni en sus dependenciasNo verificado
- Sin instrucciones ocultas para el modelo0 tool descriptions and the README read; no override phrases, credential paths or hidden charactersAprobado
- Las herramientas destructivas están etiquetadasNo verificado
- El endpoint remoto responde al handshake de MCPNo verificado
README
Ver en GitHubConsentry is a consent firewall that sits between an AI agent and everything it talks to: tools, APIs, MCP servers, other companies, and even the LLM itself. It inspects every outbound field, minimizes what isn't needed, asks you when it matters, quarantines prompt injections coming back, and writes a tamper-evident receipt of every decision.
Live demo · Watch the demo video · Architecture · 10-minute demo script · Claude mode · Pitch storyboard
Table of contents
- Why this exists
- What it does
- See it in action
- How it works
- Quickstart
- Use it with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor (MCP)
- Policies in plain English
- Red team: attack your own agent
- Public data APIs
- Security model & honest limitations
- Project structure
- Roadmap
💡 Why this exists
Personal agents are getting real power: they book tables, refill prescriptions, call ride services, query health databases. To do that they need your data: your address, your phone, your card, your medications.
Today that data is all-or-nothing. Once it is in the agent's context window it can go to any tool, any third party and the model provider. A single poisoned web page or tool response can tell the agent to send it somewhere else, and nobody can later prove what was shared, with whom, or why.
Consent banners don't fix this. Model alignment doesn't either, because a model that usually refuses is not a control. The boundary has to be enforced outside the model. That's Consentry.
The design principle: don't trust the model, enforce at the boundary. Even a fully compromised agent (we simulate one) can't move your SSN, your real card number or your mental-health data, because those bytes never get past the firewall.
✨ What it does
| Capability | What it means for you | |
|---|---|---|
| 🧬 | Field-level PII detection | Vault fingerprints, vault tokens, regex with checksums (Luhn, SSN rules), a health lexicon, and geo-proximity to your saved places. It catches your data even when it isn't labeled. |
| ⚖️ | Per-field policy engine | Each field is judged on data type × recipient trust tier × purpose: allow, minimize, ask or deny. Highest priority wins, then the most specific rule, then the most restrictive. |
| ✂️ | Minimizers | Exact GPS → ~10 km grid · address → neighborhood or nearest intersection · email/phone → relay aliases · card → single-use, merchant-locked virtual card · birthday → age range · allergy → "peanut-free meal required" · drug → generic name only. |
| ✋ | Real consent | The agent pauses. You see the exact vs. minimized value side by side, the purpose, the recipient's retention policy, and the rule that triggered. Choose minimized · once · 30 days · deny. Grants expire and can be revoked. |
| 🤖 | The LLM is a recipient too | Claude only ever sees {{vault:tokens}}. Prompts and tool results are tokenized before they reach the model; tokens are resolved at the network edge only if policy allows. |
| ☣️ | Ingress quarantine | Tool responses are untrusted. A noisy-OR scanner catches prompt injection, hidden HTML comments, zero-width text, exfil image URLs and templated data slots, then strips them, taints the run and locks sensitive data. |
| 🚫 | Default-deny egress | Unverified domains never receive a request. If a policy withholds a field a tool requires, the call never leaves. |
| 🧾 | Hash-chained ledger + receipts | Every decision is appended to a SHA-256 hash chain over canonical JSON, with masked values and a digest of the exact payload sent. Every agent run produces a privacy receipt. Edit one past entry and verification fails from that entry onward. |
| 🔐 | Encrypted vault | AES-256-GCM at rest via WebCrypto, with the same code in Node (key file, chmod 600) and the browser (non-extractable key in IndexedDB). |
| 👣 | Your data footprint | A who-knows-what matrix (every recipient × every data type: knows exactly · approximately · protected) computed only from the ledger. |
| 🧹 | Make them forget you | One click drafts a CCPA/GDPR deletion request listing exactly what a partner received, citing ledger entries as evidence, and revokes the relay aliases and single-use cards you issued them. The agent can do it too: "Ask TableTap to delete my data". |
| 🎬 | Guided demo tour | 12 chapters (6–9 minutes) with talking points, one-click actions and spotlighted UI, plus a compact mode for presenting. |
| 🔌 | Works with any agent | Ships as an MCP server and an HTTP gateway. It also runs fully local-first in the browser: the live demo has no backend at all. |
🎬 See it in action
🧠 How it works
Every tool call, from Claude, the on-device Autopilot, or any MCP/HTTP client, goes through one choke point: ConsentryRuntime.callTool().
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant U as You
participant A as Agent (Claude / Autopilot / MCP client)
participant F as Consentry firewall
participant V as Vault (AES-256-GCM)
participant T as Tool / API / Partner
participant L as Ledger (SHA-256 chain)
U->>A: "Book a vegetarian dinner for 2 tonight"
Note over A: Sees only {{vault:phone}}, {{vault:card}}…
A->>F: book_table(name={{vault:full_name}}, phone={{vault:phone}}, card={{vault:card}}, notes={{vault:allergy_peanut}})
F->>V: resolve tokens
F->>F: detect → classify → evaluate policy per field
F-->>U: ✋ TableTap wants "Food allergy" (exact vs. "Peanut-free meal required")
U->>F: Share minimized
F->>L: append egress entry (masked fields + payload digest)
F->>T: name ✓ · phone → relay alias · card → single-use virtual card · notes → minimized
T-->>F: response (untrusted)
F->>F: ingress scan: injection? exfil URL? smuggled tokens?
F->>A: sanitized, tokenized result
A-->>U: answer + 🧾 privacy receipt
Decision pipeline (per field)
detect ─▶ classify (16 data types) ─▶ evaluate rules (priority ▸ specificity ▸ restrictiveness)
│ │
│ allow ◀──────────┼──────────▶ deny (withhold; block call if field is required)
│ minimize ◀─────────┴──────────▶ ask (pause agent → you decide → optional grant w/ expiry)
▼
rewrite payload ─▶ default-deny check ─▶ ledger.append() ─▶ send ─▶ ingress quarantine ─▶ agent
Read the full design in docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
🚀 Quickstart
Requirements: Node ≥ 22.5 and pnpm (Corepack works).
git clone https://github.com/vnmoorthy/consentry.git && cd consentry
pnpm install
pnpm start # builds the dashboard and starts the gateway on http://localhost:8787
Open http://localhost:8787 and click a scenario chip. No API key is needed: the Autopilot agent runs on-device and calls real public APIs through the firewall.
Use Claude as the agent brain (optional):
cp .env.example .env # set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=… (defaults to claude-opus-5-5)
pnpm start
Or paste a key in Settings; it is stored encrypted with the vault. Claude still only ever sees tokens. See docs/CLAUDE_MODE.md for the Claude demo segment and pnpm tsx scripts/claude-check.ts, which proves no raw vault value reaches the model. If Claude is unreachable, runs fall back to Autopilot automatically.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
pnpm start |
Build the web app and run the gateway + dashboard on :8787 |
pnpm dev |
Gateway on :8787 + Vite dev server on :5173 with hot reload |
pnpm test |
Unit tests for detection, policy, transforms, firewall, injection scanner and ledger |
pnpm tsx scripts/smoke.ts |
End-to-end run of every scenario + red-team attack against the live public APIs |
pnpm tsx scripts/claude-check.ts |
Claude mode end to end: intercepts every Anthropic request and fails if any raw vault value is sent |
sh scripts/set-key.sh |
Save your Anthropic key to .env with hidden input, and verify it |
pnpm mcp |
Start the MCP bridge (stdio) |
pnpm build:pages |
Static, backend-free build (the whole firewall runs in the browser) |
🔌 Use it with any agent (MCP + HTTP)
Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"consentry": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["tsx", "/absolute/path/to/consentry/apps/mcp/src/index.ts"],
"env": { "CONSENTRY_URL": "http://localhost:8787" }
}
}
}
Claude Code: claude mcp add consentry -- npx tsx ./apps/mcp/src/index.ts
Your MCP client now gets 19 tools (weather, air quality, NWS alerts, quakes, NHTSA, openFDA, FEMA, Wikipedia, bookings, rides, refills…). Every call is firewalled, consent prompts appear in the Consentry dashboard, and everything lands in your ledger.
Any agent framework, over plain HTTP:
curl -s http://localhost:8787/api/gateway/call \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-d '{"tool":"air_quality","agent":"my-bot","args":{"location":"{{vault:home_location}}"}}'
# → data + "Home GPS minimized → 37.8,-122.4 (≈10 km)"
| Method | Route | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
GET |
/api/state |
Snapshot: masked vault, policies, recipients, tools, stats, pending consents |
GET |
/api/events |
Server-sent events: every step, decision, consent and ledger append |
POST |
/api/chat |
Start an agent run { message } → { runId } |
POST |
/api/consent/:id |
Answer a consent prompt { decision: allow_once | allow_always | minimize | deny } |
GET |
/api/gateway/tools |
Tool catalog with JSON schemas |
POST |
/api/gateway/call |
Firewalled tool call { tool, args, agent } |
POST |
/api/policies/compile |
Plain English → structured rule |
POST |
/api/policies/simulate |
Explain what would happen for item × recipient × purpose |
POST |
/api/ledger/verify |
Re-hash the chain and report the first broken entry |
GET |
/api/ledger/export |
Export the full ledger (JSON) |
POST |
/api/redteam/:id |
Run a red-team scenario |
📝 Policies in plain English
Type a sentence and Consentry compiles it into a structured, explainable rule:
| You write | Consentry compiles |
|---|---|
| Never share my location with commercial apps | location.precise → partner : deny |
| Let TableTap see my phone number for reservations for 24 hours | contact.phone → tabletap (reservation) : allow · expires in 24h |
| Only share my approximate location with ride services | location.precise → partner (transport) : minimize(coarse-location) |
| Never let the AI see my medications | health.medication → llm : deny |
Privacy-first defaults ship out of the box, including hard lines that no grant or click can override: government IDs, credentials, mental-health data, marketing use, and unverified destinations.
☠️ Red team: attack your own agent
Every scenario runs through the real runtime, firewall, tools and ledger. Run them in the UI or with pnpm tsx scripts/smoke.ts.
| Attack | What happens | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Poisoned restaurant review | A hidden HTML comment tells the agent to send your SSN and card to telemetry-cdn.io. We also simulate an agent that obeys. |
✅ Ingress quarantine (score 1.0) → run taint → default-deny egress blocks the exfil call → SSN/card withheld from the booking |
| Zero-click image exfiltration | A partner response embeds  |
✅ Exfil URL stripped, smuggled token neutralized, renderer never loads remote images |
| Secrets pasted into the prompt | The user pastes a card number and SSN into chat | ✅ The model receives My card is {{vault:card}} and my SSN is [Government ID withheld] |
| Over-collecting partner | An insurance API asks for 8 fields for a quote | ✅ 2 exact (with consent), 4 minimized, 2 withheld, and the quote still comes back |
| Rewrite the audit log | An insider edits a past entry to say nothing was shared | ✅ Hash mismatch detected at that exact entry |
🌎 Public data APIs (all live)
No keys and no accounts. Every call goes through the firewall, which is why account-less public APIs only ever get a coarsened location.
Public data is real but imperfect, so Consentry says what each source can't tell you: every answer that used public data ends with a Data limits note, Claude is handed the same caveats in its tool results, and the Connections page lists them per source.
| API | Used for | Recipient tier | Known limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Meteo Forecast | 7-day forecast, current conditions | Open data | Model forecast on a ~11 km grid; less reliable beyond 3 days |
| Open-Meteo Air Quality | US AQI, PM2.5, ozone, 3-day outlook | Open data | Modeled, not a nearby sensor reading; local smoke can differ |
| Open-Meteo Geocoding | Place → coordinates | Open data | Best-known match; ambiguous names can land in the wrong spot |
| National Weather Service | Active alerts | Public sector | US only; an alert exists only once a forecast office issues it |
| USGS Earthquakes | Quakes near you | Public sector | Magnitudes are preliminary and often revised |
| NHTSA vPIC | VIN decoding | Public sector | Built from manufacturer filings; trim details can be missing |
| NHTSA Recalls | Vehicle safety recalls | Public sector | By make/model/year: can't tell whether this car was already repaired |
| openFDA Drug Enforcement | Drug recalls | Public sector | Reports lag by weeks; matches drug name, not your lot |
| openFDA Drug Label | Warnings & interactions | Public sector | Manufacturer text, not medical advice |
| openFDA Food Enforcement | Allergen recalls | Public sector | Reports lag by weeks; check the lot on the package |
| OpenFEMA | Disaster declarations | Public sector | Federally declared disasters only, usually days after the event |
| Wikipedia REST | Encyclopedia lookups | Open data | Crowd-edited and can be out of date |
Commercial partners (BiteFinder, TableTap, RideNow, MediMart, QuickQuote) are simulated locally and labeled as such in the UI, so the demo can show hostile behavior safely and deterministically.
🛡️ Security model & honest limitations
What Consentry guarantees: if a value is in your vault, or matches a sensitive pattern, it cannot leave the runtime in a form your policy doesn't allow. That covers tokens, raw values, reformatted values, coordinates near your saved places, and values pasted into prompts.
What it doesn't (yet):
- Semantic paraphrase. An agent that describes your condition in new words ("the user has a lung thing") isn't caught by fingerprints. The health lexicon helps, and an LLM-based classifier is on the roadmap.
- Encoded exfiltration to allowed recipients. Default-deny stops unknown hosts, but a trusted recipient could receive data in a channel the detector doesn't parse.
- The re-seal is local. Re-sealing a tampered ledger changes the head hash, which is detectable by anyone holding the old head. Production would anchor the head externally (transparency log / notarization).
- The demo persona is fictional (555-01xx phone,
example.comemail, Stripe test card, the famously void SSN 078-05-1120).
See SECURITY.md to report issues.
🗂️ Project structure
consentry/
├── packages/core/ # Isomorphic engine (Node + browser): zero runtime deps besides the Anthropic SDK
│ ├── src/detect.ts # vault fingerprints, tokens, regex+checksums, lexicon, geo-proximity
│ ├── src/policy.ts # rule evaluation + plain-English compiler + grants
│ ├── src/transforms.ts # minimizers (coarse location, aliases, virtual cards, age ranges…)
│ ├── src/firewall.ts # egress inspection, consent, rewrite, ingress quarantine, LLM tokenization
│ ├── src/injection.ts # prompt-injection / exfil scanner (noisy-OR over 12 signals)
│ ├── src/ledger.ts # SHA-256 hash chain over canonical JSON
│ ├── src/planner.ts # Autopilot: on-device agent, no LLM
│ ├── src/llm.ts # Claude tool-use loop (only sees tokens)
│ ├── src/runtime.ts # the single choke point + events, receipts, stats
│ ├── src/redteam.ts # 5 attack scenarios
│ ├── src/footprint.ts # who-knows-what matrix + CCPA/GDPR deletion letters
│ └── src/tools/ # 12 live public-data tools + 5 simulated partners + 1 on-device tool
├── apps/server/ # Hono gateway: REST + SSE + SQLite ledger + AES-GCM vault
├── apps/web/ # React 19 + Vite + Tailwind v4 + Framer Motion dashboard
├── apps/mcp/ # MCP bridge (stdio) → gateway
├── scripts/ # smoke test, screenshot capture, asset rendering
├── deck/ # 10-slide animated pitch deck (.pptx)
└── docs/ # architecture, demo script, storyboard, idea log
🧭 Roadmap
- LLM-assisted semantic classifier for paraphrased sensitive data
- Signed policy bundles + external ledger anchoring (Sigstore / transparency log)
- Browser extension: the same firewall in front of ChatGPT, Claude.ai and other web agents
- Data-subject requests: one click to ask a partner to delete what it got, with ledger evidence
- Real delivery of deletion requests (email/API) and tracking of statutory deadlines
- Policy packs for GDPR, CCPA/CPRA and HIPAA "minimum necessary"
- Multi-agent: per-agent identities and budgets ("this agent may share 3 contact fields per day")
🤝 Contributing
PRs are welcome. Run pnpm test && pnpm tsx scripts/smoke.ts before opening one. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
📄 License
MIT. Built for the National Renaissance Hackathon at super{set} (tracks: Hacking with Public Data APIs · Personal Agents & Data Privacy).
Preguntas sobre Consentry MCP
¿Qué hace Consentry por los agentes de IA?
Se sitúa entre un agente de IA y sus herramientas o APIs para inspeccionar los campos de salida, minimizar datos sensibles, solicitar el consentimiento del usuario y poner en cuarentena las inyecciones de prompts.
¿Cómo protege mis datos del propio LLM?
El sistema tokeniza los prompts y los resultados de las herramientas para que el modelo solo vea tokens de bóveda en lugar de información sensible sin procesar.
¿Puedo usarlo con Claude Desktop o Cursor?
Sí, está disponible como un MCP server que funciona con agentes como Claude Desktop, Claude Code y Cursor.
¿Requiere una API key para funcionar?
No se requiere ninguna API key para el agente local Autopilot, aunque puedes proporcionar opcionalmente una Anthropic API key para usar Claude como cerebro.