MCP server de Python Code Validator
Commit 17 ago 2026Valida, repara y ejecuta código Python mediante aserciones o doctests proporcionados por el usuario dentro de un sandbox seguro y aislado de la red.
También conocido como jkanselaar/python-code-validator, python-code-validator
- Stars
- 0
- Herramientas
- —
- Descargas, 30 días
- —
- Última versión
- 1.22.0
- Último commit
- 17 ago 2026
- Licencia
- MIT
¿Qué es Python Code Validator MCP?
Python Code Validator es un MCP server. Valida, repara y ejecuta código Python mediante aserciones o doctests proporcionados por el usuario dentro de un sandbox seguro y aislado de la red.
Resumen generado a partir del README del proyecto
Acerca del MCP server de Python Code Validator
La función principal de este servicio es verificar que el código Python generado por IA realmente cumpla con la lógica prevista. Los desarrolladores pueden enviar código junto con aserciones específicas o líneas de doctest para garantizar su corrección. El sistema ejecuta el código dentro de un sandbox seguro y aislado de la red que cuenta con un sistema de archivos de solo lectura para evitar acciones no autorizadas. Ofrece tres herramientas principales: validate_python para comprobaciones estáticas, repair_python para corregir errores automáticamente y execute_python para ejecutar código frente a los ejemplos proporcionados por el usuario.
A este servicio alojado se accede vía HTTP y puede integrarse en entornos como Claude Code, Cursor y VS Code. Los usuarios pueden comenzar con una clave gratuita que permite 25 comprobaciones estáticas al día, mientras que las funciones más avanzadas, como la ejecución en sandbox, requieren una clave de pago. El servidor incluye medidas de seguridad integradas como una política de seguridad AST, análisis con bandit y escaneo de credenciales. También cuenta con un mecanismo de reparación determinista que solo devuelve una solución cuando todos los ejemplos proporcionados pasan correctamente.
Qué puedes hacer con él
- 1Reparación de lógica de Python defectuosaUn agente de IA puede reparar automáticamente el código que no cumple con requisitos específicos utilizando la herramienta de reparación.
- 2Verificación de código mediante asercionesLos desarrolladores pueden pasar casos de prueba específicos o doctests para asegurar que una función produzca el resultado esperado.
- 3Automatización del control de calidad de Python en CIIntegra el validador en GitHub Actions para comprobar automáticamente los pull requests en busca de errores de sintaxis y patrones inseguros.
- 4Escaneo de vulnerabilidades de seguridadUtiliza el servicio para detectar importaciones dinámicas ocultas o posibles filtraciones de credenciales en scripts de Python.
Escrito a partir del README del proyecto. Cada caso de uso se verifica con una cita del mismo.
Cómo instalar Python Code Validator MCP
Formatos verificados el 10 nov 2026Instalar Python Code Validator MCP en Claude Code
$ claude mcp add --transport http python-code-validator https://api.statemind.ai/mcpInstalar Python Code Validator MCP en Cursor
~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"python-code-validator": {
"url": "https://api.statemind.ai/mcp"
}
}
}Instalar Python Code Validator MCP en VS Code
.vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"python-code-validator": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.statemind.ai/mcp"
}
}
}Instalar Python Code Validator MCP en Codex
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.python-code-validator] url = "https://api.statemind.ai/mcp"
Instalar Python Code Validator MCP en Gemini CLI
~/.gemini/settings.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"python-code-validator": {
"httpUrl": "https://api.statemind.ai/mcp"
}
}
}README
Ver en GitHubPython Code Validator
An MCP server that validates, repairs and runs Python against the examples it
is supposed to satisfy — validate_python, repair_python and execute_python
over HTTP at https://api.statemind.ai/mcp, with a free key and no account.
A hosted service that proves AI-generated Python does what you asked. State the
intent — assertions or doctest lines — and the code is run against it inside a
container with no network and a read-only filesystem; a fix comes back only when
every example passes. On the QuixBugs defects that is 41% repaired and 77%
refused as not doing what they say, with no false alarms on the corrected
programs — where ruff and mypy flag the defect in none of them
(the numbers).
The checks that need no intent come with it: syntax and lint diagnostics, an AST
security policy that also catches calls hidden behind dynamic imports and runtime
attribute lookups, a bandit pass, a credential scan and deterministic repair —
one verdict with a score. Asking the same question twice inside ten minutes is
answered from the first answer and costs nothing (x-msvc-repeat: 1).
This repository holds the client side: the MCP configuration, the CI script and
the pre-commit hook. The service itself runs at https://api.statemind.ai, so
there is nothing to install or host.
A key, without an account
curl -s -X POST https://api.statemind.ai/v1/keys
# {"api_key": "msvc_free_…", "tier": "free", "calls_per_day": 25, "modes": ["static"]}
25 static checks a day, metered per UTC day, and a few keys per address: enough
to try it and to run it over a small project, not a supply. Every answer carries
the state of the allowance (x-quota-remaining, x-quota-reset), so a client
can back off before it is cut off.
MCP
Registered in the official MCP registry as
ai.statemind/python-code-validator, a name verified against the domain that
serves it rather than a GitHub account. Any MCP client adds it with one
block:
{
"mcpServers": {
"python-code-validator": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.statemind.ai/mcp",
"headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer msvc_free_…" }
}
}
}
- Claude Code:
claude mcp add --transport http python-code-validator https://api.statemind.ai/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer msvc_free_…" - Cursor:
~/.cursor/mcp.json, same block. - VS Code / Copilot:
.vscode/mcp.jsonunder"servers".
A client that only launches a command uses the stdio bridge in this repository instead, which forwards the same tool over HTTPS:
{
"mcpServers": {
"python-code-validator": {
"command": "python3",
"args": ["/path/to/python-code-validator/mcp_stdio.py"]
}
}
}
Or as a container, which the Dockerfile here builds:
docker build -t python-code-validator .
docker run -i --rm -e VALIDATOR_API_KEY python-code-validator
Gemini CLI installs the same bridge as an extension, with the instruction file that makes it get used:
gemini extensions install jkanselaar/python-code-validator
Three tools, named after what they do to the code:
| tool | runs the code | key |
|---|---|---|
validate_python |
no | free |
repair_python — also returns fixed_code |
no | paid |
execute_python — also runs it in a sandbox |
yes | paid |
The old single python_code_validator tool, with its mode argument, still
answers for clients that already configured it, but is no longer listed.
Saying what the code was supposed to do
Every check above passes on a function that computes the wrong answer. The one thing that catches it is the intent, and the agent that asked for the code is the only one who has it — so pass it along:
{"code": "def bitcount(n): …", "mode": "execute",
"options": {"examples": "assert bitcount(127) == 7"}}
Doctest lines (>>> bitcount(127) then 7) work the same way, as do >>>
examples already written in the source. execute_python runs them in the
sandbox: one that does not hold is a python:example-mismatch error, and the
repair search returns a fix only when every example passes. On the QuixBugs
defect set — real bugs, hidden test inputs deciding correctness — that repairs
41% and refuses 77% as not doing what they say, with no false alarms on the
corrected programs.
Repeating a call costs nothing: the same key asking the same question — same
mode, same code, same examples — is answered from the answer it already got,
marked x-msvc-repeat: 1, so an agent that checks its work at every step is not
billed for verdicts that cannot have changed.
Claude Code plugin
An instruction can be ignored; a hook cannot. The plugin checks every Python file Claude Code writes or edits, in the turn it was written, and hands the errors back to the model instead of to you:
/plugin marketplace add jkanselaar/python-code-validator
/plugin install python-code-validator@statemind
Nothing to configure: it mints and keeps its own free key on first use. A file that comes back accepted is silent, a rejected one stops the turn with the offending lines named, and an identical file is not asked about twice. It never ends a session over its own trouble — an unreachable service or a spent allowance lets the turn continue, and the allowance says how to raise it.
Set VALIDATOR_API_KEY to use a paid key instead of the free tier, and
VALIDATOR_URL to point at your own deployment. The plugin also carries the
validate-python skill, for the part a hook cannot do: stating the intent as
examples and running the code against them.
Cursor hook
The same script, wired to Cursor's postToolUse, where the verdict comes back
as context on the conversation instead of as an exit code:
mkdir -p .cursor/hooks
base=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jkanselaar/python-code-validator/main
curl -sf $base/plugin/hooks/validate_written.py -o .cursor/hooks/validate_written.py
curl -sf $base/cursor/hooks.json -o .cursor/hooks.json
Project hooks run from the project root, which is why the command in
cursor/hooks.json is a path relative to it. For a hook
that applies to every project instead, put the script in ~/.cursor/hooks/ and
the same block in ~/.cursor/hooks.json with the command
python3 ./hooks/validate_written.py --cursor.
Making the agent use it
Configuring the server is not what gets it called: the instruction file is.
AGENTS.md in this repository is that text, written to be dropped
into any project under whichever name the client reads:
mkdir -p .github
curl -sf https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jkanselaar/python-code-validator/main/AGENTS.md \
| tee AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md GEMINI.md .github/copilot-instructions.md >/dev/null
Cursor reads rules with front matter instead, so that one is a separate file —
copy .cursor/rules/python-code-validator.mdc
into .cursor/rules/ of the project.
The short version, if you would rather add a line to instructions you already have:
Write what the code should do as
assertexamples before writing the code, and pass them inoptions.examples. Callvalidate_pythonafter every edit andexecute_pythononce a function is finished, not again until what it does has changed. When a call returnsfixed_code, take it — the service ran it against your examples. Do not present code that came backvalid: false.
CI
The service hands out the client, so a workflow needs no checkout of this repository and no secret:
- run: |
curl -sf https://api.statemind.ai/v1/client -o validate.py
python3 validate.py --changed-against "origin/${{ github.base_ref }}"
Or as an action, from the Marketplace:
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write # so the run can comment its result on the pull request
steps:
- uses: jkanselaar/python-code-validator@v1.22.0
with:
api-key: ${{ secrets.VALIDATOR_API_KEY }} # optional; free tier without it
The changed Python is validated and offending lines are annotated on the diff, failing the job on syntax errors and unsafe patterns. Files the service refuses outright (over its 200 kB limit) are skipped with a warning rather than failing the run.
The run also leaves one comment on the pull request, edited in place on later
pushes rather than repeated: what was accepted, what was repaired and how much of
the day's allowance is left. Without pull-requests: write nothing is written
and the job is unaffected; comment: "false" turns it off.
On the free tier the action keeps its key in the workflow cache, one per
repository per day, so the allowance belongs to the repository rather than to the
run. With api-key set the cache is skipped.
Pre-commit
repos:
- repo: https://github.com/jkanselaar/python-code-validator
rev: v1.22.0
hooks:
- id: python-code-validator
The client itself
validate.py is standard library only, so it also works as python validate.py file.py in a Makefile, a git hook or a container:
$ python3 validate.py service.py
::error file=service.py,line=88,title=SyntaxError::invalid syntax
FAIL service.py score=0.66
0/1 files accepted
VALIDATOR_API_KEY is used when set; otherwise the client mints a free key —
keeping it in VALIDATOR_KEY_FILE when that names a path, which is how a series
of runs shares one allowance. VALIDATOR_URL points it at another deployment.
VALIDATOR_SOURCE names the caller, which is only ever counted: a run inside a
workflow says github-action by itself.
The badge
A repository whose Python is checked on every pull request can say so:
[](https://api.statemind.ai/?src=badge)
HTTP
curl -s https://api.statemind.ai/v1/validate \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VALIDATOR_API_KEY" \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-d '{"code": "def f(:\n pass\n", "mode": "static"}'
mode is static, repair or execute; repair and execute need a
configured key. Submitted code is not logged.
A refused call says what to do about it, so a caller with no operator to ask can resolve it itself:
{"error": "payment_required",
"remedy": {"action": "upgrade_key", "hint": "A free key covers static only. …"}}
Paying for calls
A free key covers 25 static checks a day, and one address gets a few keys a day, so the allowance is a trial rather than a supply. Beyond it a key carries credits: a static check costs 1, a repair 3 and a sandboxed run 10, and an identical call repeated within ten minutes is answered from the first one for free.
Credits are bought with a card, without an invoice or anyone to ask:
curl -s -X POST https://api.statemind.ai/v1/keys/checkout \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
-d '{"api_key": "'"$VALIDATOR_API_KEY"'", "credits": 500}'
That answers with a Stripe Checkout page; the credits are on the key seconds
after the card clears (500 credits is €10). An agent with a Gnosis wallet can
instead pay in xDAI without a browser — GET /v1/pricing states both routes.
Examples
examples/ holds three files and the client to send them with: one
that passes every check and still returns the wrong number, one the security
policy refuses, and one that comes back accepted from the sandbox.
Licence
MIT.
Preguntas sobre Python Code Validator MCP
¿Cómo agrego Python Code Validator MCP a Claude Code?
Ejecuta claude mcp add --transport http python-code-validator https://api.statemind.ai/mcp en tu terminal. Añade --scope user para que esté disponible en todos los proyectos.
¿Cómo agrego Python Code Validator MCP a Cursor?
Abre ~/.cursor/mcp.json y añade el servidor en mcpServers, usando la configuración de Cursor que se muestra en la sección de instalación de arriba.
¿Cómo maneja el validador el código que produce un resultado incorrecto?
El validador utiliza la intención proporcionada, como aserciones o líneas de doctest, para ejecutar el código en un sandbox; si el código falla estos ejemplos, devuelve un error de desajuste (mismatch error).
¿Existe alguna forma de usar el servicio de forma gratuita?
Sí, puedes obtener una clave gratuita que permite realizar 25 comprobaciones estáticas al día sin necesidad de una cuenta.
¿El servicio busca vulnerabilidades de seguridad?
Sí, incluye una política de seguridad AST que detecta llamadas ocultas tras importaciones dinámicas y búsquedas de atributos en tiempo de ejecución, además de un análisis con bandit y un escaneo de credenciales.
¿Puedo evitar que se me cobre por repetir la misma solicitud de validación?
Sí, si haces la misma pregunta dos veces en un intervalo de diez minutos, el servicio te proporciona la primera respuesta de forma gratuita.