Entwirf und verifiziere beobachtbare Runtime-Outputs für Python-, PowerShell- oder Node.js-Skripte, die Bulk-Operationen oder API-Requests durchführen.
- GitHub Stars
- 41.038
- Dateien
- 6
- Letzter Commit
- 11. Nov. 2026
- Lizenz
- MIT
- Erlaubte Tools
- —
Was macht der batch-script-progress Skill?
batch-script-progress ist ein Agent Skill. Entwirf und verifiziere beobachtbare Runtime-Outputs für Python-, PowerShell- oder Node.js-Skripte, die Bulk-Operationen oder API-Requests durchführen.
Zusammenfassung erzeugt aus der SKILL.md des Skills.
Über den batch-script-progress skill
Entwickler, die Python-, PowerShell- oder Node.js-Skripte für Bulk-Operationen schreiben, können diesen Skill nutzen, um beobachtbare Runtime-Outputs zu entwerfen und zu verifizieren. Der Fokus liegt darauf, einen strukturierten Contract für die Fortschrittsmeldung, das Scheitern einzelner Elemente und finale Zusammenfassungen zu erstellen, ohne die zugrunde liegende Verarbeitungslogik oder den Exit-Status des Skripts zu verändern. Dies ist besonders nützlich für lang laufende Loops, API-Request-Batches oder Datei-Verarbeitungsaufgaben, bei denen eine stille Ausführung das Monitoring erschwert.
Ein Agent sollte diesen Skill laden, wenn er ein Skript modifizieren muss, um Start-Benachrichtigungen, periodische Fortschritts-Updates und Terminal-Summaries einzubauen. Der Skill stellt sicher, dass Fortschrittsdaten an einen separaten Channel wie stderr gesendet werden, um den primären stdout-Result-Stream nicht zu verunreinigen. Er basiert auf spezifischen Implementierungsmustern für verschiedene Runtimes und enthält einen sprachübergreifenden Verifier, um zu beweisen, dass der Output sichtbar ist, während der Prozess noch läuft. Nutzer sollten beachten, dass dies nicht für UI-Progress-Bars oder Monitoring-Infrastruktur gedacht ist, sondern dazu dient, zuverlässige, maschinenlesbare oder menschenlesbare Diagnose-Streams zu etablieren.
Was ein agent damit machen kann
- 1Fortschritt zu Bulk-API-Skripten hinzufügenModifiziere ein Node.js-Skript, das viele API-Requests durchführt, um die Anzahl der verarbeiteten, erfolgreichen und fehlgeschlagenen Elemente via stderr zu melden.
- 2Konsistenz des Exit-Status sicherstellenAktualisiere ein Python-Batch-Skript, um eine Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse einzufügen, während der ursprüngliche Exit-Code-Contract erhalten bleibt.
- 3Sicheres Error-Reporting implementierenKonfiguriere ein Skript so, dass bereinigte Fehlergründe für einzelne Elemente ausgegeben werden, ohne rohe Exceptions oder sensible Daten zu dumpen.
Geschrieben basierend auf dem SKILL.md des skills. Jeder use case wurde gegen ein zitat daraus geprüft.
So installierst du den batch-script-progress Skill
Jeder Befehl kopiert den Skill-Ordner in das Skills-Verzeichnis des Clients. Starte den Client neu oder beginne eine neue Session, um ihn zu laden.Den batch-script-progress Skill in Claude Code installieren
~/.claude/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.claude/skills/batch-script-progressDen batch-script-progress Skill in Claude Code (project) installieren
.claude/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress .claude/skills/batch-script-progressDen batch-script-progress Skill in Codex installieren
~/.agents/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.agents/skills/batch-script-progressDen batch-script-progress Skill in Gemini CLI installieren
~/.gemini/skills/batch-script-progress/SKILL.md
$ npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.gemini/skills/batch-script-progressDen batch-script-progress Skill in Claude.ai installieren
npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress batch-script-progress && zip -r batch-script-progress.zip batch-script-progress # claude.ai → Customize → Skills → + → Create skill → Upload a skill → batch-script-progress.zip
Automatisierte Checks
Geluften am 13. Nov. 2026Vollständiger Bericht →Hat unsere automatischen Prüfungen bestanden. Das ist kein Sicherheitsaudit: Lesen Sie die Skripte, bevor ein Agent sie ausführt. Wie die Checks funktionieren
- Source Repository verknüpft und erreichbargithub/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress is public and reachablegithub.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/HEAD/skills/batch-scr ↗Bestanden
- Open Source Lizenz (OSI)MITspdx.org/licenses/MIT.html ↗Bestanden
- Commit oder Release im letzten JahrLast commit 2026-11-11github.com/github/awesome-copilot/commits ↗Bestanden
- Keine Download-und-Ausführen-Muster oder Zugangsdatendiebstahl in Skripten3 scripts read; no download-and-run, remote eval, base64 execution or credential uploadBestanden
- Keine versteckten Anweisungen in SKILL.mdNo override phrases, safeguard switches, credential requests or hidden charactersgithub.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/HEAD/skills/batch-scr ↗Bestanden
- Vorab erlaubte Tools sind eingeschränktNo pre-approved tools; the agent asks before using onegithub.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/HEAD/skills/batch-scr ↗Bestanden
SKILL.md
Auf GitHub ansehenBatch Script Progress
Make generated batch scripts observable while they run, without changing their processing contract. Design start, periodic progress, per-item failure, and final-summary output together with result streams and exit status. A progress-bar library alone does not establish this contract.
1. Fix the existing contract
Read the script, callers, and nearby tests before editing. Identify:
- Input unit, known or unknown total, and whether enumeration is lazy.
- Existing stdout format and consumers, runtime version, and interactive versus redirected execution.
- Continue-on-error or fail-fast policy, retry rules, skip rules, transaction boundaries, and cancellation behavior.
- Existing exit codes and what callers treat as success.
Preserve these decisions. Do not add retries, parallelism, dependencies, or a new failure policy just to add progress output. If partial failures currently return zero, report the partial outcome honestly while keeping that exit contract. If the contract is missing or contradictory, ask for the decision that changes behavior; do not silently make it.
2. Define the output contract before implementation
Choose a small, stable vocabulary and fields, reusing the repository logger where suitable:
- Start: operation name, total or explicit unknown, and initial counters. Emit before expensive enumeration; discovery itself may need progress.
- Progress: processed, succeeded, failed, skipped, total or unknown, and elapsed time. Add a sanitized current-item identifier only when useful.
- Item failure: safe identifier, failure category or sanitized reason, and whether processing will continue. Emit when observed, independently of the normal progress interval.
- Summary: completed, partial, failed, or cancelled; final counters; elapsed time; known unprocessed count if available; and the exit status required by the existing contract.
Define processed = succeeded + failed + skipped for items that reached a terminal outcome. Keep in-flight and not-started items separate. Count each item once; retry attempts are not additional processed items. Do not label an item successful before its required commit, write, or acknowledgement. If a transaction rolls back, report rolled-back work rather than claiming durable success.
For an unknown total, report counts without a fabricated percentage, ETA, or remaining count. Do not materialize a stream just to count it. For zero items, emit start and summary with zero counts; never divide by zero.
3. Choose output streams and cadence
Reserve stdout for the established machine-readable result, pipeline objects, or protocol. Put progress and diagnostics on a separate channel; stderr is the portable default for standalone CLI scripts. Stderr output alone does not imply failure: callers must use the agreed exit code and result contract. Verify callers that treat any stderr as failure before changing their output. If stdout is reserved and stderr is incompatible, use an existing compatible logger or sink only when the caller already supports it. Do not move progress to stdout or another stream with changed semantics. If no compatible channel exists, stop and ask whether the output contract may change, or report that progress cannot be added safely.
Use a bounded cadence, such as every configured number of items or elapsed interval, rather than unconditionally logging every item. Emit start, failures, and summary regardless of that cadence. Preserve required per-item audit records separately. Avoid unbounded in-memory failure lists and repeated stack traces. Redact credentials, query parameters, personal data, and sensitive paths before formatting; do not dump raw exceptions or whole input records by default.
Use monotonic time for intervals and duration. Ensure output is flushed or drained so notifications arrive before exit. Use plain newline-delimited records under redirection; enable terminal rewriting or colors only for an appropriate TTY. Keep log-field meanings consistent across languages, not necessarily their exact formatting or libraries.
A time check at the end of a loop cannot emit while one item is blocking. For a long item, use existing progress callbacks, stage notifications, or a safely integrated heartbeat where the runtime permits it. A Node.js timer cannot run through synchronous event-loop blocking; a PowerShell progress display is not a durable log. If mid-item progress cannot be added without changing execution semantics, emit the current stage before it starts and disclose the notification gap. Do not promise a periodic heartbeat that the implementation cannot deliver.
4. Implement the smallest compatible change
Read language notes and safe examples for the selected runtime. The examples are executable output-contract probes, not production processors; adapt their emitter and accounting to the existing code rather than copying their failure policy.
Keep reporting separate from processing decisions. In concurrent code, serialize reporting through the coordinator and count completed outcomes, not submissions. On handled failure or cancellation, attempt one final summary and preserve the original outcome; a summary-write error must not replace the original processing exception. Do not swallow cancellation as an ordinary item failure. For host-managed cancellation, including PowerShell host stops, preserve the existing host behavior; do not convert stop exceptions into item failures or promise a final summary after host termination. Use finally for applicable cleanup, but verify the actual cancellation path in the supported host when graceful cancellation is part of the contract.
Do not force successful termination to deliver buffered output. In Node.js prefer setting process.exitCode and draining writes over an immediate process.exit(). Respect existing host/library semantics in PowerShell: a reusable function should not exit its caller. Forced termination, process crashes, and broken output pipes can prevent final reporting; do not claim otherwise.
5. Verify before reporting completion
Read verification cases, then run focused tests for the changed script with harmless fixtures. Capture stdout and stderr separately and check the real exit status. Verify start/progress ordering, monotonic counters, sanitized failures, exactly one summary on supported paths, and unchanged result contents and processing policy.
Prove liveness by reading the child process output while it is still running, not by examining output collected after exit. Check both terminal and redirected behavior when both are supported. A controlled pause after a progress event is a useful deterministic probe: receive the event, confirm the child has not exited, then release it. Keep such gates in harmless test fixtures or the test harness; do not add stdin waits, sleeps, or cancellation hooks to normal production processing solely to make a test pass. Prefer an existing callback or injectable processing boundary. If no safe deterministic seam exists, test the real path only with harmless inputs or report liveness as unverified. A watchdog may fail the test; it must not manufacture a successful result.
The bundled cross-language verifier runs the Python, PowerShell, and Node.js probes with normal, partial-failure, preserved partial-failure exit-zero, empty, unknown-total, fail-fast, simulated-cancellation, and live-output cases. It checks the probes only; it does not prove that an arbitrary generated script or automatic skill selection works.
Run it from this skill folder with Node.js 20 or later:
node tests/verify-examples.mjs
It also requires Python 3.9 or later and PowerShell 5.1 or later. See the language notes for executable overrides. Missing runtimes are failures, not silently skipped coverage.
Deliverables
Return the changed script, its output/exit contract, and focused verification results. Distinguish executed tests from inspection and unexecuted cases. Do not call the script verified merely because it prints a progress bar or the skill metadata passes validation.
Gotchas
- Counting before logging can make discovery silently consume an entire stream.
- Writing status with PowerShell
Write-Outputadds strings to the success pipeline. - Measuring only buffered output after exit cannot prove progress visibility.
- A final message saying
completedhides partial failure unless the outcome and counters explain it. finallyis not a guarantee of reporting after forced termination.
Dateien in diesem Skill
6batch-script-progress Skill-Fragen
Wie installiere ich den batch-script-progress Skill in Claude Code?
Führe npx degit github/awesome-copilot/skills/batch-script-progress ~/.claude/skills/batch-script-progress aus. Claude Code lädt Skills aus ~/.claude/skills (alle Projekte) oder .claude/skills (ein Projekt) und nutzt einen Skill, wenn seine Beschreibung zur Aufgabe passt.
Welche Clients können den batch-script-progress Skill nutzen?
Jeder Client, der das Agent Skills-Format liest: Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI und claude.ai (als ZIP hochladen). Skripte im Skill laufen nur dort, wo der Client Codeausführung erlaubt.
Wie sollte der Fortschritt gemeldet werden, wenn die Gesamtzahl der Elemente unbekannt ist?
Melde die Anzahl der Elemente, ohne künstliche Prozentsätze, ETAs oder verbleibende Counts zu verwenden. Materialisiere keinen Stream, nur um ihn zu zählen.
Wohin sollten Fortschritts- und Diagnoseinformationen in einem CLI-Skript gesendet werden?
Fortschritt und Diagnosen sollten auf einem separaten Channel ausgegeben werden. stderr ist der portable Standard für Standalone-Skripte, während stdout für maschinenlesbare Ergebnisse reserviert bleiben sollte.
Wie stelle ich sicher, dass der Fortschritt während der Ausführung tatsächlich sichtbar ist?
Du musst die Liveness nachweisen, indem du den Output des Child-Prozesses liest, während er noch läuft, anstatt den Output erst nach dem Beenden des Prozesses zu untersuchen.