Ermöglicht es AI Agents, den Symbol-Graphen eines Repositories abzufragen, um Impact-Analysen, Call Tracing und Struktur-Audits in Python, TypeScript und Go durchzuführen.
Auch bekannt als zaebee/codegraph-brain, codegraph-brain
- Stars
- 2
- Tools
- 11
- Downloads, 30 Tage
- 2.281
- Neueste Version
- 0.39.2
- Letzter Commit
- 8. Nov. 2026
- Lizenz
- MIT
Was ist CGIS Code Graph MCP?
CGIS Code Graph ist ein MCP server. Ermöglicht es AI Agents, den Symbol-Graphen eines Repositories abzufragen, um Impact-Analysen, Call Tracing und Struktur-Audits in Python, TypeScript und Go durchzuführen. Er stellt 11 Tools bereit, etwa cgis_ingest, cgis_overview, cgis_find_symbol.
Zusammenfassung generiert aus dem README des Projekts
Über CGIS Code Graph MCP server
Das CGIS Code Graph Intelligence System bietet AI Agents eine Möglichkeit, Codebases mithilfe eines strukturierten Symbol-Graphen zu navigieren, anstatt sich auf Textsuche oder das Lesen von Dateien zu verlassen. Es parst Repositories mittels tree-sitter, um Aufrufe, Imports und Containment zwischen Symbolen abzubilden und speichert diese Daten in einer lokalen SQLite-Datenbank. Dieser Ansatz ermöglicht es Agents, präzise Impact-Analysen und Call Tracing in Python-, TypeScript- und Go-Projekten durchzuführen.
Das System läuft lokal ohne die Notwendigkeit von Accounts oder Telemetrie, sodass der Graph auf deiner Festplatte bleibt. Entwickler können es mit MCP-Clients wie Claude Desktop oder Cursor via uvx integrieren, um den Server von PyPI abzurufen. Es bietet spezialisierte Tools für Struktur-Audits, wie etwa die Prüfung der Erreichbarkeit für Autorisierungen oder die Messung von Architectural Drift. Durch das Auflösen von Aufrufen in fully qualified names werden Halluzinationen verhindert, die bei standardmäßigen textbasierten Retrieval-Methoden häufig vorkommen.
Was du damit machen kannst
- 1Impact-Analysen durchführenErmittle, welche Upstream-Komponenten brechen, wenn eine spezifische Funktion oder Methode geändert wird.
- 2Execution Flow tracenFolge der transitiven Aufruf-Kette, um genau zu sehen, was eine spezifische Methode aufruft.
- 3Security-Coverage auditierenVerifiziere, dass jeder Request-Handler erfolgreich seinen vorgesehenen Authorization Guard erreicht.
- 4Code-Qualitätsmetriken messenAnalysiere die Codebase auf God Classes, Kopplung und Package Cohesion.
Geschrieben aus dem README des Projekts. Jeder Use Case wurde gegen ein Zitat daraus geprüft.
So installierst du CGIS Code Graph MCP
Formate geprüft am 10. Nov. 2026CGIS Code Graph MCP in Claude Code installieren
$ claude mcp add codegraph-brain -- uvx codegraph-brainCGIS Code Graph MCP in Cursor installieren
~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"codegraph-brain": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"codegraph-brain"
]
}
}
}CGIS Code Graph MCP in VS Code installieren
.vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"codegraph-brain": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"codegraph-brain"
]
}
}
}CGIS Code Graph MCP in Claude Desktop installieren
claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"codegraph-brain": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"codegraph-brain"
]
}
}
}CGIS Code Graph MCP in Codex installieren
~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.codegraph-brain] command = "uvx" args = ["codegraph-brain"]
CGIS Code Graph MCP in Gemini CLI installieren
~/.gemini/settings.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"codegraph-brain": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"codegraph-brain"
]
}
}
}CGIS Code Graph MCP tools 11
Erkannt aus dem READMEcgis_ingestcgis_overviewcgis_find_symbolcgis_analyze_impactcgis_trace_flowcgis_get_structurecgis_contextcgis_metricscgis_audit_reachabilitycgis_driftcgis_validate
| cgis_ingest | — | |
| cgis_overview | — | |
| cgis_find_symbol | — | |
| cgis_analyze_impact | — | |
| cgis_trace_flow | — | |
| cgis_get_structure | — | |
| cgis_context | — | |
| cgis_metrics | — | |
| cgis_audit_reachability | — | |
| cgis_drift | — | |
| cgis_validate | — |
Konfiguration
GUARDIAN_PROVIDERGUARDIAN_SKEPTIC
| Name | Beschreibung | Typ |
|---|---|---|
| GUARDIAN_PROVIDER | — | |
| GUARDIAN_SKEPTIC | — |
Automatisierte Checks
Geluften am 12. Nov. 2026Vollständiger Bericht →Unsere automatisierten Checks bestanden. Das ist kein Security-Audit: Lies den Code und gib dem Server nur den minimal notwendigen Zugriff. Wie die Checks funktionieren
- Source Repository verknüpft und erreichbarBestanden
- Open Source Lizenz (OSI)Bestanden
- Commit oder Release im letzten JahrBestanden
- Package-Name ähnelt keinem populären PackageBestanden
- Remote Endpoint nutzt HTTPSNicht geprüft
- Destruktive Tools sind markiertBestanden
- Keine versteckten Anweisungen an das ModellBestanden
- Kein kritischer Hinweis im Paket oder seinen AbhängigkeitenBestanden
README
Auf GitHub ansehen🧠 CGIS: Code Graph Intelligence System
A code graph your AI agent can query instead of guess
Ask "what breaks if I change this?" and get the call chain, not a guess.
CGIS parses a repository with tree-sitter into a graph of fully qualified symbols and the calls, imports and containment between them, stores it in SQLite, and serves it to AI agents over MCP. An agent that would otherwise grep and read whole files asks the graph instead.
- Languages: Python · TypeScript / TSX · Go (structure and metrics only; its impact answers are a lead to confirm by reading — exp4, measured on one library, golang/crypto, mostly its ssh package; not measured on applications) · JSON and YAML (data key declarations only, when data keys are enabled with
--data-keys: no symbols, calls or impact) - Runs: locally — no account, no telemetry; the graph never leaves your disk (the one opt-in exception)
$ cgis ingest src --output graph.db
$ cgis impact cgis.query.engine.QueryEngine.get_flow_graph --db graph.db --depth 2
🔍 Analyzing transitive upstream callers of: cgis.query.engine.QueryEngine.get_flow_graph
METHOD cgis.query.engine.QueryEngine.get_flow_graph (cgis/query/engine.py:215)
├── FUNCTION cgis.query.context.context_service._collect_callees (cgis/query/context/context_service.py:44)
│ └── FUNCTION cgis.query.context.context_service.build_context (cgis/query/context/context_service.py:96)
└── METHOD cgis.guardian.collector.ContextCollector._graph_sections (cgis/guardian/collector.py:174)
├── METHOD cgis.guardian.collector.ContextCollector.collect_graph_context (cgis/guardian/collector.py:213)
└── METHOD cgis.guardian.collector.ContextCollector.collect_for_chunk (cgis/guardian/collector.py:303)
Real output — CGIS run on its own source.
🚀 Quickstart
In Claude Code (fastest)
/plugin marketplace add zaebee/codegraph-brain
/plugin install cgis@codegraph-brain
That ships the MCP server, a skill that teaches the agent when to query the graph instead of reading files, and /cgis:ingest to build the graph on first use. The server is pulled from PyPI on demand via uvx, so there is nothing to clone or build.
Any other MCP client (Cursor, Claude Desktop, …)
{
"mcpServers": {
"cgis": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "codegraph-brain", "cgis-mcp"] }
}
}
From the terminal
# No install needed — uvx fetches it from PyPI
uvx --from codegraph-brain cgis ingest ./my-project --output graph.db
uvx --from codegraph-brain cgis impact "my_module.core_function" --db graph.db --depth 5 # who calls this
uvx --from codegraph-brain cgis trace "my_module.MyClass.run" --db graph.db --depth 3 # what this calls
# add --format mermaid (or json) to either for a diagram or machine-readable output
Or install it for good: pip install codegraph-brain (Python 3.12+), then use cgis directly. The full command list is in CLI_USAGE.md.
📈 Proof at Real Scale
CGIS runs on a working twelve-repository estate — four languages, 8,146 commits, shipping daily. On its FastAPI backend it classifies 82.7% of 87,845 edges definitively and prints the remaining 17.3% rather than inventing targets for them — including the part that is CGIS's own gap.
That share rose from 11.4% in #459, which stopped counting calls to missing symbols as resolved. About 4 points of what is left is a known resolver gap, not something undiscoverable: ingesting app/ strips the app. prefix its imports carry, and the import path does not yet reconcile the two — the same backend ingested at its package root reports 13.2%. The number is what the tool admits it cannot place today, and it is allowed to move the unflattering way.
Read the case study → — every figure measured and reproducible, including what CGIS doesn't cover.
🤔 Why a graph, and how this differs
Text retrieval hands an agent chunks that look related. It cannot say which of three functions named save a call reaches, or what sits five callers up. CGIS resolves every call site to a fully qualified name when the source allows it — and when it does not, the edge stays marked unresolved and is counted, never filled with a plausible guess.
| If you use… | CGIS adds |
|---|---|
| grep / file reads in the agent | Transitive callers and callees in one call, without spending context on whole files |
| LSP-backed symbol tools (e.g. Serena) | A persisted whole-repo graph for multi-hop impact, coupling, PageRank and drift |
| A repo map (e.g. aider) | Resolved edges you can traverse and audit, with the resolved/unresolved ratio reported |
🤖 MCP Tools
The main tools:
| Tool | Answers |
|---|---|
cgis_ingest |
Build or incrementally refresh the graph |
cgis_overview |
Where to start: sizes and the largest packages, when you have no FQN yet |
cgis_find_symbol |
Partial name → candidate FQNs |
cgis_analyze_impact |
What breaks upstream if this changes? |
cgis_trace_flow |
What does this call, transitively? |
cgis_get_structure |
Class / module hierarchy |
cgis_context |
A compact GraphRAG context package for one symbol |
cgis_metrics |
Coupling, god classes, PageRank, package cohesion |
cgis_audit_reachability |
Authz / IDOR coverage — does every handler reach its guard? |
cgis_drift |
How far each domain has moved from its declared pattern |
cgis_validate |
Graph integrity: resolved vs unresolved edges |
All 16 tools, with parameters: MCP_REFERENCE.md.
🏗️ How It Works
- Extract — tree-sitter parsers turn each file into nodes and raw call edges.
- Resolve — the
ResolverEnginemaps raw calls to fully qualified names, or leaves them explicitly unresolved. - Store — SQLite holds the graph; queries are breadth-first traversals over it.
graph LR
A[Source Code] --> B[Extractors]
B --> C[Resolver Engine]
C --> D[(SQLite Graph DB)]
D --> E[MCP Server]
D --> F[Prompt Compiler]
E --> G[AI Agents]
F --> G
The details — and a pipeline graph CGIS regenerates from its own source on every change — are in HOW_IT_WORKS.md, and the full map of every document with its generated cross-references to the code is in docs/INDEX.md.
🛡️ Guardian: Graph-Aware Code Review
Guardian is CGIS's built-in LLM reviewer — it reviews pull requests using the graph as context, not just the diff text. It runs in CI and posts inline comments anchored to the exact line.
- Two-stage, recall-first: a finder surfaces every plausible defect (optimised for recall), then a separate skeptic pass filters false positives — closer to how human reviewers work, and far more reliable than a single precision-gated prompt.
- Local or cloud, no lock-in: point it at Ollama (
qwen2.5-coder,llama3.1,granite-code, …) for free local inference, or at Mistral / Gemini / Claude / OpenCode Go (DeepSeek) in the cloud. You can even mix them — a strong cloud finder with a free local cross-model skeptic. - Graph-aware context: the reviewer sees impact graphs, architectural drift, and project ontology — so it catches structural and convention defects a flat-diff reviewer can't.
- Deterministic anchoring: every inline comment is positioned by a verbatim quote from the diff, not the model's (often wrong) line guess.
- Dogfooded & measured: Guardian reviews CGIS's own pull requests, and a benchmark harness scores it against curated ground truth — so prompt changes are validated, not guessed.
# Build the graph, then review a PR with a local model (no API key).
# --inline posts over HTTPS with GH_TOKEN (or GITHUB_TOKEN); no gh CLI needed.
# The reusable workflow exports GH_TOKEN for you.
cgis ingest ./src --output graph.db
GUARDIAN_PROVIDER=ollama GUARDIAN_MODEL=qwen2.5-coder:14b \
uv run python scripts/guardian_review.py --pr 123 --db graph.db --inline
# Or OpenCode Go / DeepSeek: deepseek-v4.1-flash unless GUARDIAN_MODEL names another.
# GUARDIAN_OPENCODE_EFFORT is low unless set (the catalog lists low|high|max; other values
# pass through to the gateway). GUARDIAN_OPENCODE_BASE_URL pins a different gateway.
# No ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is needed for this provider.
GUARDIAN_PROVIDER=opencode-go GUARDIAN_MODEL=deepseek-v4.1-flash OPENCODE_API_KEY=... \
uv run python scripts/guardian_review.py --pr 123 --db graph.db --inline
# Or a Claude skeptic over a Mistral finder: Claude Haiku 5.5 unless GUARDIAN_SKEPTIC_MODEL names
# another, at GUARDIAN_ANTHROPIC_EFFORT=low unless set (low|medium|high|xhigh|max). Claude models
# reject a sampling temperature, so GUARDIAN_TEMPERATURE must be unset.
GUARDIAN_SKEPTIC=anthropic ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... MISTRAL_API_KEY=... \
uv run python scripts/guardian_review.py --pr 123 --db graph.db --inline
In GitHub Actions, opencode-go needs no static key: the reusable workflow exchanges a short-lived GitHub OIDC token for inference access immediately before the review. Enable OIDC for GitHub Actions in the Opencode console, set the calling repository's OPENCODE_CLIENT_ID variable, and grant the review job id-token: write. OPENCODE_API_KEY is then minted at run time and never stored as a secret. Sign-in happens when GUARDIAN_PROVIDER is opencode-go, opencode, or unset (unset means the minted key makes opencode the auto-detected provider); an explicit other provider skips it.
No GPU on hand? Benchmark it on a notebook GPU → — free end to end, since the fixtures score without an LLM judge. Or point Guardian at a remote Ollama → — over an frp stcp tunnel, no public port, and a guard that refuses a review of a silently truncated prompt.
🔒 Privacy
CGIS collects nothing: no telemetry, no analytics, no account. Your code and the graph built from it stay on your machine. The one exception is opt-in: Guardian, if you run it with a cloud model, sends the reviewed diff to the provider you chose. See PRIVACY.md.
🛠️ Development
Requires Python 3.12+ and uv.
git clone https://github.com/zaebee/codegraph-brain && cd codegraph-brain
uv sync
make pytest
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the standards: strict MyPy, linting, ontology compliance.
💼 Architecture Audit
CGIS is free and you can run it yourself. If you would rather have the analysis than the tool, I run a fixed-price audit of your codebase's structure — authorisation coverage, blast radius, coupling, architectural drift — delivered in five working days, $2,400 fixed, with an explicit list of what the analysis cannot see. Read what's included →
CGIS Code Graph MCP Fragen
Wie füge ich CGIS Code Graph MCP zu Claude Code hinzu?
Führe claude mcp add codegraph-brain -- uvx codegraph-brain in deinem Terminal aus. Füge --scope user hinzu, damit der Server in jedem Projekt verfügbar ist.
Wie füge ich CGIS Code Graph MCP zu Cursor hinzu?
Öffne ~/.cursor/mcp.json und füge den Server unter mcpServers hinzu, mit der Cursor-Config aus dem Installationsabschnitt oben.
Welche Tools bietet CGIS Code Graph MCP?
Er stellt 11 Tools bereit, darunter cgis_ingest, cgis_overview, cgis_find_symbol, cgis_analyze_impact, cgis_trace_flow.
Welche Sprachen unterstützt CGIS?
Es unterstützt Python, TypeScript/TSX und Go (für Struktur und Metriken) sowie JSON und YAML für Daten-Key-Deklarationen.
Wird mein Code an einen Server gesendet?
Nein, das Tool läuft lokal ohne Telemetrie oder Accounts, und der Graph bleibt auf deiner Festplatte, außer du nutzt Cloud-Modelle für den Guardian-Reviewer.
Wie kann ich das mit Claude Code nutzen?
Du kannst es über den Plugin Marketplace Command hinzufügen: /plugin marketplace add zaebee/codegraph-brain und anschließend /plugin install cgis@codegraph-brain.